Mentha And Allied Products (P) ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
03 August, 2005·"The next ground relates to the incorrect computation of deduction under Section 80HHA. The appellant in the head office account was dealing in purchase an sale of natural mentha oil. In the pharmaceutical division it was manufactured certain basis drugs. Deduction under Section 80HHA had been claim...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahe Aalam vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: S Saksena
03 August, 2005·(2) The Magistrate may, if he thinks fit, on the application of the prosecution or the accused, issue a summons to any witness directing him to attend or to produce any document or other thing. (3) The Magistrate may, before summoning any witness on such application, require that the reasonable expe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Mentha Allied Products (P) Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
03 August, 2005·4. The Revenue aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Bareilly preferred an appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal relying upon the judgment reported in 143 ITR 590 held that the income from duty draw back was directly derived from the undertaking and, therefore, entit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar Pandey Son Of Shyam ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: S Kumar
03 August, 2005·3. Considering the discharge of function by Gram Panchayat more effectively a Government Order was issued on 1.7.1999 wherein apart from the other aims and objects, terms and conditions, a policy decision was taken to appoint employees of as many as 8 government departments including the employees l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chiranji Lal Bhang Dealer vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: P Krishna
03 August, 2005·2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the dealer submitted that in view of the judgment of this court in the case of Subhash Chandra Bhang Dealer v. CST 1986, UPTC 354, the authorities below were not justified in fixing the turnover on the basis of c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Swarup Singh S/O Sri Navrang ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: S Misra
01 August, 2005·8. Heard Sri Devraj learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the State of U.P. It has been contended by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that the lower appellate court has reversed the findings of the trial court without following...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashtbhuja Pandey Son Of Late ... vs U.P. State Road Transport ...
Judges: S Kumar
01 August, 2005·6. Reliance has been placed upon par as 6, 10 and 11 of the judgment in U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and Ors. v. Mahesh Kumar Mishra and Ors. reported in 2000(3) Supreme Court Cases, 4501. Another judgment has been relied upon by the counsel for the petitioner is Om Kumar and Ors. v. Union ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Executive Officer, Nagar Palika ... vs State Of U.P. Through Revenue ...
Judges: S Srivastava
01 August, 2005·" Till the next date of listing the order of the Sub Divisional Officer dated 10.1.2005 as well as the order of the Additional Commissioner dated 23.3.05 shall remain stayed. Parties shall maintain status quo with regard to nature and possession of the land in dispute as existing today." The matter ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahipal Singh Son Of Baru Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: A Tandon
01 August, 2005·5. The Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits, U.P. Lucknow, however, passed an order dated 13th July, 2005, whereby it has been provided that the elections of Sri Bhupendra Singh for the post of President and Sri Ishwar Pal Singh for the post of Secretary are legal and valid and are being recognized...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yamuna Prasad Rai Son Of Late Raghu ... vs State Of U.P. Through Special ...
Judges: S Ambwani
01 August, 2005·4. Now the complain is that no one has acted upon the orders of this Court and that neither leave has been granted nor any disciplinary action has been initiated. 5. This Court does not want to again decide this writ petition without calling for counter affidavit. Let learned Standing Counsel file a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.