Smt. Shabana vs Addl. City Magistrate (Sixth) ...
Judges: S Khan
04 August, 2005·3. It is not disputed that initially Abid Hussain grandfather of Smt. Shabana, i.e., father of Shri Shamim Ahmad was tenant of the house in dispute. 4. Petitioner contested the proceedings and contended that she was residing along with her grant-father the tenant hence after his death she became the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Archana Goel vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
04 August, 2005·3. The facts giving rise to these writ petitions are as under : That the respondent-landlord filed a suit for eviction of tenant being S.C.C. Suit No. 99 of 1994 which is subject matter of Writ Petition No. 19187 of 2004 and S.C.C. Suit No. 100 of 1994 which is subject matter of Writ Petition No. 19...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sant Kumar Son Of Shri Shiv Singh, ... vs State Of U.P. And Mukesh Singh Son ...
Judges: P Srivastava
04 August, 2005·1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The proceedings in Complaint case No. 192 of 1998, Mukesh v. Sant Kumar pending in the court of 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etawah initiated on the basis of an application filed under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Indrasani Devi And Ors.
Judges: Y Singh, R Rastogi
04 August, 2005·2. We have heard learned Counsel Mr. Neelambar Tripathi holding the brief of Mr. N.K. Chatterjee learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Deepak Verma, learned Counsel for the claimants-respondents. 3. Learned Counsel for the claimants-respondents submits that no permission was granted to the insur...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Atee Mohammad S/O Munshi, Akhtar ... vs State Of U.P. And Shri Ved Vyas ...
Judges: P Srivastava
04 August, 2005·1. Heard Sri S.A. Shah, learned counsel appearing for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application has been filed for quashing the proceedings arising out crime No. 148 of 1985, under Sections 399, 402, 307 I.P.C. and also crime nos. 149, 150, 151 of 1985 under Section 25 Arm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Om Prakash vs Brij Mohan And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
04 August, 2005·2. From the averments of the facts, it is apparent that there is long drawn litigation between the parties with regard to an earlier application filed by the landlord under Section 21(1)(b) of 'the Act'. The possession of the shop in dispute has been delivered to the tenant pursuant to the proceedin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash And Jaiprakash Son Of ... vs State Of U.P. And Kamlawati Devi ...
Judges: P Srivastava
04 August, 2005·1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of opposite party No. 2. 2. This application has been filed invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court for quashing the criminal proceedings in case No. 754 of 1990, Kamlwati v....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mushahid Beg And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: N Mehrotra
04 August, 2005·3. Uttar Pradesh Gram Panchayat Adhikari Sangh through its President have moved an application for their impleadment to oppose the Writ Petition No. 4779 (S/S) of 2005. 4. I have heard Shri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Vinod Kumar Singh Additional Advocate General for th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh And Anr. vs Iiird Addl. Distt. Judge And Ors.
Judges: S Khan
04 August, 2005·1. Respondent No. 3 Smt. Bhagwan Devi filed (original suit) Suit No. 424 of 79 against petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 Ramesh and Prem who are son and father. The suit was filed under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act according to which a person can sue for possession only and only on the basis of prior poss...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
R.P. Locks Company Through Its ... vs The Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: P Krishna
03 August, 2005·3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. The account books were rejected by the authorities below on the basis of the facts found at the time of enquiry conducted on 5.12.1985 wherein it was found that the dealer/applicant despatched 764 locks from Aligarh to Lucknow. The ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.