Budhaee Son Of Shri Piyarey vs Collector, Assistant ...
Judges: S Khan
19 April, 2005·5. In some cases instead of eviction award of damages is proper relief. For awarding damages in lieu of eviction the following considerations are relevant: 1. What is the status of owner. 2. What is the status of unauthorized occupant. 3. For what purpose owner was using the land in dispute before u...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhanu Pratap Singh S/O Abinash ... vs Commissioner, Chitrakoot Dham ...
Judges: R Tiwari
19 April, 2005·2. This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 4.3.99 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) passed by respondent No. 1, the Commissioner, Chitrakoot Dham Mandal, Banda whereby the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prabhu Dayal Son Of Shri Dulley Ram vs Bharat Heavey Electricals ...
Judges: V Saran
19 April, 2005·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Sandeep Saxena, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has undergone apprenticeship training in production with the respondent-Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited from 22.11.1986 to 24.11.1987...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Obedullah Son Of Late Shri Hafiz ... vs State Of U.P., Through Its ...
Judges: S Khan
19 April, 2005·1. The sale deed which has been impounded through impugned order was executed on 13.12.02 through which an area of .29 acres ( 1174.79 sq. m.) was purchased by the petitioner. In the sale deed market value of the land was shown to be Rs. 95000/- (at the rate of Rs. 8,00,000/- per hectare) and requis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Meerut Cement Co. (P) Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
19 April, 2005·Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Tribunal was legally justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,10,719 on account of difference in the cost of construction as added by the AO under Section 69B of the IT Act? 2. The brief facts of the case giving rise to the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Late Smt. Inder Devi Widow Of ... vs Unknown
Judges: S Mehrotra
19 April, 2005·17. A perusal of the said affidavit, sworn on 11.4.2005, shows that the averments made in the Testamentary Petition have been reiterated in the said affidavit. 18. By the order dated 13.7.2004, notice was directed to be issued to the next-of-kins mentioned in paragraph 4 of the Testamentary Petition...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheesh Ram S/O Sri Kirana Singh vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
19 April, 2005·8. The charge was framed under Section 302 IPC against the appellant on 31.5.1985 by the learned Judge, who charged the appellant for having committed the murder of Mahendra by intentionally causing his death on 29.12.1984 at about 9 P.M. 9. The appellant pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit, Meerut vs Uptron Powertronics Ltd.
Judges:
19 April, 2005·2. The present Reference relates to the assessment year 1985-86. 2. The present Reference relates to the assessment year 1985-86. 3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows: 3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows: The resp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abhay Nandan Tripathi Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: T Agarwala
19 April, 2005·2. By the impugned order dated 18.3.2005, the petitioner has been suspended, pending disciplinary enquiry being initiated against him under Rule 7 of U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 (hereinafter referred to us the Rules). 3. Sri Ashok Khare, the learned Senior counsel sub...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sobhawati Shukla And Anr. vs Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari And ...
Judges: A Sahi
19 April, 2005·7. On the other hand, Sri U.N. Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents, has urged that the Basic Shiksha Adhikari is not entrusted with any such power and that the aforesaid order dated 23.2.1996, being void, was rightly directed to be ignored and orders dated 3.8.1995 and 31.7.1995 were ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.