Rajeev Kumar Son Of Ramphal Singh ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: R Tiwari
21 April, 2005·2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 17.3.2005 passed by the District Magistrate, Moradabad, which has been appended as Annexure-8 to the writ petition. A further direction has a so been sought commanding the respondents not to take any action on the basis of the afor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Shri Radha Kishan Goel
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
21 April, 2005·4. Heard Sri A.N. Mahajan, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Shakeel Ahmad, learned counsel for the assessee. 5. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that Explanation 5 stood added under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, w.e.f. 01.10.1984, which deals with the pen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dhananjai Singh S/O Shiv Nath ... vs Mukhya Suraksha Ayukt (Chief ...
Judges: S Kumar
21 April, 2005·4. The counsel for the respondents Sri Lalji Sinha has placed reliance upon a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 1997 Supreme Court Cases (Labour and Service) 492 Delhi Administration through its Chief Secretary and Ors. v. Sushil Kumar. The Apex has held that "Verification of the character a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeep Kumar Kedia Son Of Late Ram ... vs The State Of U.P. And Central ...
Judges: R Singh
21 April, 2005·2. This application has been filed against the order dated 15.12.2004, passed by the learned Spl. Judge Anti Corruption (West), Lucknow in Crl. Case No. 2 of 1981 (R.C. No. 3 of 1980 ) State v. Bijendra Singh and Ors., whereby the applications dated 15.2.2004 filed by the applicants were rejected. 3...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs U.P. Sales And Service Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
20 April, 2005·1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad has referred the following question of law under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), for the assessment year 1982-83 for opinion to this Court : 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the cas...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh Kumar And Ors. vs Xiiith, A.D.J. And Ors.
Judges: M Prasad
20 April, 2005·3. The tenant contested the application on the grounds, inter alia, that the requirement of the applicants was not genuine and application for release was moved only with a view to pressurize the tenant for enhancing the rent. It was pleaded that there was an agreement of March, 1969, between the pa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Singh Son Of Shri Sharda ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through Its ...
Judges: S Yadav
20 April, 2005·"6. That the report of Board of Medical Officers alongwith all connected documents and representation dated 15.9.1999 of the petitioner were sent to the IGP, C/S, CRPF, Lucknow for consideration of his rehabilitation case. But he did not find place for rehabilitation by the opinion of rehabilitation...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Mishra Son Of Sri Uma ... vs District Inspector Of Schools And ...
Judges: V Nath
20 April, 2005·3. Writ Petition No. 47743 of 2003 has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the respondent to consider his claim for regularization on the post of LT Grade Teacher in view of the provisions contained under Section 33 F of U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board Act 1982. 4. In bo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Niranjan Lal Son Of Late Kanha vs Board Of Revenue And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava
20 April, 2005·3. Whether the impugned order of Board of Revenue reviewing the order of Learned Single Member of the Board of Revenue is illegal and vitiated in law? 5. In connection with the first question, it has to be seen whether proceeding for substitution in restoration application is a miscellaneous proceed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uptron Powertronics Limited vs The Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: P Krishna
20 April, 2005·2. Both the revisions arise out of a penalty order passed under Section 15A(1)(a) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the assessment year 1984-85 (U.P. and Central), for not depositing the admitted amount of tax alongwith the return within the prescribed period due for...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.