Cit vs Shyam Auto Service
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
01 April, 2005·"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in cancelling the penalty under Section 271B of Rs. 1,00,000 when the assessee has obtained the audited account on 28-10-1989 and the same was no submitted on the plea that it was handed over to the counsel for pr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munna Singh @ Shivaji Singh, Son Of ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Guru Ram ...
Judges: U Pandey
01 April, 2005·4. With the help of aforesaid cases, the decision has to be taken in the present revisions as to whether these petitions are barred under Section 397(2) of the Code or they are maintainable either as criminal revisions or petitions under Section 482 of the Code. This point which arises for determina...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Champaran Sugar Co. Ltd.
Judges:
01 April, 2005·2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present case are as follows : The reference relates to the assessment year 1981-82. The assessee-respondent is a limited company and derives income from the manufacture and sale of sugar. The assessing officer disallowed a sum of Rs.30,396 as bonus paid...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Chauhan Bros.
Judges:
01 April, 2005·The assessee-respondent is a registered partnership firm for the assessment year 1984-85. The return of income was filed late by more than 29 month on 15-1-1987. The penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(a) of the Act were initiated and after affording opportunity of hearing a sum of Rs. 15,140 w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shayam Sunder Lal S/O Sri Mukut ... vs U.P. State Road Transport ...
Judges: R Tiwari
01 April, 2005·3. The services of the petitioner-workman had been terminated w.e.f. 30.12.1989. Aggrieved by his termination he had raised an industrial dispute which was referred for adjudication to Labour Court, U.P., Kanpur where it was registered as Adjudication Case No. 126 of 1991. 4. The counsel for the pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Malleable Pipe Fitting ... vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
01 April, 2005·3. Brief facts of the case are that for the above assessment year, both under the U.P. Trade Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act, two assessment orders have been passed on 28.02.1994. Against Commissioner (Judicial), Meerut. Both the appeals were allowed and the matter were remanded back to the assess...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.