Gurbux Singh vs Cit
Judges:
04 April, 2005·4. In contra learned Standing counsel submitted that the words totally blind used in section 80U means only one thing that it is a case of stone blindness or complete blindness. He also referred in extenso the medical certificate filed by the assessee and submitted that since in the medical certific...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Abdul Sharif Son Of Mulayam Khan ...
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
04 April, 2005·4. The defence was of denial and of the victim having committed suicide as she wanted to live with him ( Abdul Sharif) at Bombay and somebody had told her that he had married with another lady at Bombay. An information regarding her having committed suicide was said to have been given at the police ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Gurbux Singh vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agarwal, P Krishna
04 April, 2005·5. We have considered the respective submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties. We find that Section 80U was introduced in the Statute book for the first time by the Finance Act, 1968. The original Section 80U reads as follows. " 80-U - Deduction in the case of blind persons- In computing t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sameer Ahmad, Son Of Shri Ameer ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
04 April, 2005·"(d) to issue a writ, order or (direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders dated 9.8.2004 (Annexure "6" to the writ petition) and the order dated 11.8.2004 (Annexure "7" to the writ petition) passed by the District Excise Officer, Aligarh, respondent No. 4." 3. As the counter affidavi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Narain Tripathi S/O Devi ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
04 April, 2005·4. The defence of the accused was of denial. 5. In all, the prosecution examined 11 witnesses. Two witnesses were examined by the defence also. On appraisal of the evidence, the court below found that the charge of Section 409 I.P.C. was not proved. However, the charges of Sections 436 and 201 I.P.C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Dilbagh Shah And Sons
Judges: R Agarwal, P Krishna
04 April, 2005·1. The ITAT, Delhi, has referred the following question under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this Court: Whether, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct in con...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Smt. Pushpa Mohan Trustee
Judges: R Agarwal, P Krishna
04 April, 2005·1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, has referred following question of law under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this Court: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Incomeax Appellate Tribunal was legal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Puttu Lal Son Of Khan Sahai Yadava ...
Judges: M Jain, M Chaudhary
04 April, 2005·3. Lacerated wound skin deep about right parietal and occipital bone joint of size 3 cm x 1/2 cm. All injuries were simple, caused by blunt object and about 1/2 day old. Munni Lal 1. Linear abrasion on right knee joint by friction of size 1/4 cm x 1/4 cm. 2. Lacerated wound in anterior aspect of lef...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Rajpati Devi vs Ram Sewak Singh And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava
04 April, 2005·The other facts argued are factual regarding the execution of the deed and payment of the consideration. The second appeal cannot be admitted on facts. No substantial question of law arise for decision in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed." 5. Learned counsel for the appellant premise...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Sridhar Ram Das
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
04 April, 2005·1. Whether in view of the facts an circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in cancelling the penalty order under Section 271B when the assessee has obtained the audited accounts on 31-10-1989 and not submitted the same on the plea that the assessees accountant was indisposed? 2. Whether, o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.