Rizwan S/O Sri Iliyas And Sarafat ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And ...
Judges: P Srivastava
11 April, 2005·2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 21.8.2000 and also the proceedings initiated on the basis of case Crime No. 43 of 2000, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C. Police Station Behat, District Saharanpur pending in the court of Additiona...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwana Singh And Naurang Both ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: S Srivastava
11 April, 2005·2. It would appear from the record that upon initiation of proceeding under Section 122B of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R.Act by Tahsildar Chandpur, the petitioner preferred objection claiming to be in authorised possession over the land as the same was allocated to him by the Pradhan of the, village on 9,8,19...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Brown And Root Int. Inc., As Agent ...
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
11 April, 2005·The reference relates to the asst. yr. 1983-84. The respondent-assessee is an employee of M/s Brown & Root Int. Inc., a nonresident company, which entered into a contract with Oil & Natural Gas Commission, a Government of India undertaking, in connection with extraction of oil, gas, etc. from the oi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muradnavi And Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Judicial ...
Judges: K Ojha
11 April, 2005·2. Heard Sri Abhay Saxena, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA and have gone through the record. 3. List was revised. None appeared for the O. P. No. 2, Sabbir Ali. 4. The fact of the case is that the O. P. No. 2 Sabbir Ali moved application at kotwali, Chandausi, district Moradabad, t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Deota Deen Bachai Lal
Judges: R Agarwal, R Kumar
11 April, 2005·Whether the ITAT was justified in cancelling the penalty under Section 271B for the assessment year 1991-92 although the assessee failed to submit audit report along with their return within the time specified under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2. The present reference relates to the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Upper Ganges Sugar And Industries ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary To ...
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
11 April, 2005·5. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner by Sri Sudama Ram Chamoli, Officer Superintendent in the distillery unit of the petitioner company, in which it has been stated that P.D. Form 25 has been received back by the petitioner and was forwarded to the Excise Inspector...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Manju Singh Wife Of Dharam Sen ... vs Tara Chand Alleged Son Of Ridhwa ...
Judges: K Ojha
11 April, 2005·3. No injury to abdominal viscera. 5. The patient remained admitted from 8.5.1993 to 19.5.1993 when he was discharged from the hospital. 6. After investigation charge sheet was submitted under Section 307, 323, 324, 504 I.P.C. and Criminal Case No. 2095 of 1993, State v. Tara Chand and Anr. was regi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shitla Prasad Dube Son Of Sri ... vs State Public Services Tribunal, ...
Judges: A Lala, S Misra
11 April, 2005·1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. The petitioner in this writ petition challenged the judgment and order passed by the State Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow. Horn paragraph 27 onwards of such judgment, we find that re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Gold Wheels
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
11 April, 2005·3. Heard Sri A.N. Mahajan, learned standing counsel for the Revenue. No one appears on behalf of the assessee. 4. Learned Counsel for the Revenue submitted that issue involved in the present case is covered by the decision of this Court in, the case of CIT v. Sri Sidh & Co. 2003 UPTC 461 (All). It i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Kay Kay Family Trust
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
11 April, 2005·5. We have carefully considered the respective submissions of the counsel for the parties and have also perused all the three orders annexed with the reference. The facts which are either not disputed, or are, at this stage, beyond the plea of controversy, may briefly be noticed. The returns were fi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.