Rashid Ahmad Son Of Sri Azim Ullah vs U.P. State Road Transport ...
Judges: V Misra
22 September, 2004·Heard Sri Y.K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel & Sri Samir Sharma learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 1. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned award dated 27.10.1992 (Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition) passed in Adjudication case ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kishore Seth (Deceased) And ... vs Ram Avtar And Ors.
Judges: N Mehrotra
22 September, 2004·6. The defendants preferred an appeal and the appellate Court held that lease in question was for manufacturing purpose of breaking pulses and it will be deemed to be a lease from year to year as provided under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. A six months' notice for the determination o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Ganga Glass Works (P.) Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
22 September, 2004·2. The present reference relates to the assessment years 1977-78 to 1979- 3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows : The respondent-assessee is a private limited company enjoying income from manufacture of glass articles. During the course of assessment for the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Narain Dubey vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: D P Singh
22 September, 2004·(2) No promotion shall be denied to a person merely on the ground of his disability : Provided that the appropriate Government may, having regard to the type of work carried on in any establishment by notification and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in such notification, exem...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Ganga Glass Works (P) Ltd.
Judges:
22 September, 2004·3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present Reference are as follows: The respondent-assessee is a private limited company enjoying income from manufacture of glass articles. During the course of assessment for the years 1976-77 to 1979-80, the Income-tax Officer declined the assessee's c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs Rani Laxmi Devi
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
22 September, 2004·(ii) Jaswant Rai v. CBDT (1982) 133 ITR 19 (Del). 4. It is not in dispute that the respondent while voluntarily disclosing her wealth under the Disclosure Act had not paid the amount of tax due on the net wealth nor had invested any amount in securities as provided in Sub-section (3) of Section 3 of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajai Kumar Singh Son Of Shri Kamla ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: R Tiwari
21 September, 2004·2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition praying, inter alia, for a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 26.6.1991 (Annexure 9 to the writ petition) passed by respondent No. 4. 3. The petitioner was appointed as a 'Saving Advertiser' by respondent No. 3 vide appointment letter dated 7.5...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Lakhan Vishwakarma vs Iind Additional District Judge ...
Judges: A Kumar
21 September, 2004·2. The petitioner, by means of this writ petition, has challenged the order dated 20.10.1986 passed by the Revisional Court whereby the Revisional Court set aside the judgment of the trial Court, allowed the revision and decreed the suit filed by respondent-landlord. 3. The facts leading to this wri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Hindustan Motors Finance Co.
Judges:
21 September, 2004·7. Insofar as the grant of registration is concerned, he submitted that the findings given by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner that two new partnershave broughtin their personal funds and they are partners which has not been challenged and, therefore, the registration has rightly been granted. H...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharma Dev S/O Late Sri Tej Ram And ... vs U.P. State Road Transport ...
Judges: R Tiwari
21 September, 2004·12. It may be noted that the Court in the aforesaid case relied upon 1986 LIC Vol.2, Shitla Prasad v. State of U.P. page-2025 and held that the regulations framed by the Corporation in 1981 are not applicable to the petitioners/workmen as they have not been notified under Section 13B of the Act. 13....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.