Smt. Kusum Jaiswal vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
29 October, 2004·The applicant is a lady and has been assessed to income-tax in the status of an individual. The present reference relates to the asst. yr. 1,973-74 for which the relevant previous year ended on 31st March, 1973. Originally, the applicant had not filed her return of income prior to 27th Feb., 1974. T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chief Commissioner (Admn.) vs Sharma Sugar Industries
Judges:
29 October, 2004·"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Tribunal was correct in believing the statement of the Munim in the cross examination by the assessee's counsel on 26-3-1980 when the said Munim had admitted before the Income Tax Officer on 17-9-1979 that he had not written the Cane Pur...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Smt. Azimunnisa Begum
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
29 October, 2004·2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows : The reference relates to the asst. yr. 1975-76. One Smt. Khatoon Bibi along with several other persons was owner of M/s Noori Sugar Factory. Smt. Khatoon Bibi has gone to Karachi in 1947 and the Asstt. Custodian, Evac...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kumar Gupta vs A.D.J. (E.C. Act) And Ors.
Judges: A Varma
29 October, 2004·3. I have heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri R.K. Srivastava, learned standing counsel. 4. Sri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava vehemently argued that the learned courts below committed manifest error in rejecting the petitioner's application for grant of an ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Som Engineering Corporation vs Cit
Judges:
29 October, 2004·4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the item of Rs. 51,314.74 was entered twice in the purchase account on account of some error but it did not reflect on the profits of the firm. According to him there was neither any gross and wilful neglect on the part of the assessee nor any frau...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashish Tandon vs Greater Noida Industrial ...
Judges: M Katju, S Ambwani
29 October, 2004·4. A notice dated 10-2-2001 was issued to the petitioner by the Project Incharge of the Authority intimating that a partial amendment has been made in the policy/ condition for raising constructions, by which the allottees of the land prior to 27-2-1999. In Alfa/Beeta/Gama Sectors were required to m...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Principal Officer C/O Arkay Wires ...
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
29 October, 2004·The company feeling aggrieved, preferred an appeal before the AAC, who after examining the evidence on record, gave the finding that the selling agency firms were rendering services to the respondent-company but nevertheless he held that the payments in question were not allowable deductions because...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs Smt. Phoolwati Agarwal
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
28 October, 2004·1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following two questions of law under Section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), for opinion to this court : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justif...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Camphor And Allied Products Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: R Kumar
28 October, 2004·4. For the assessment year 1982-83 applicant had purchased material for Rs. 4,60,470/-, Iron sheet for Rs. 3,66,850.10, stationary chart cotton, sanitary fitting for Rs. 83,283.81p. For the assessment year 1983-84 applicant had purchased Iron sheet for Rs. 3,11,132.40p. and stationery chart and blow...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ambika Son Of Late Basudev Singh vs Ram Bhual Son Of Jagdish
Judges: S Harkauli
28 October, 2004·4. Whether the election petition is time barred? 5. Whether the nomination paper of Sita Ram was wrongly rejected? 6. Whether the election of respondent No. 1 is liable to be declared void in view of wrong rejection of the nomination paper of Sita Ram? List on 17th November 2003 for evidence of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.