Mathura Tiwari Son Of Ram Charitar ... vs The District Judge, Om Prakash ...
Judges: V Misra
24 November, 2004·Sri K.N. Rai, learned Counsel represents the petitioner and Sri D.S. Tewari and learned Standing Counsel represent the respondents. 1. The facts of the case in brief are that a money suit was filed in the Court below by the plaintiff-appellant (respondent No. 2 in this writ petition) against the def...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India (Uoi) Through ... vs Lakhimunni And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, M Khan
24 November, 2004·2. This appeal arises out of the award passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal awarding an amount of Rs. 4,00,000 to the claimants-respondents because of the accidental death of Ram Sharan. 3. The fact that Ram Sharan was bona fide ticket holder of the train in question is not disputed. It is also not...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax vs Dinesh Kumar
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
24 November, 2004·1. Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is legally correct in holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act in respect of his share in the value of immovable property which belonged to the firm of which the asses-see is a partner ? 2. The prese...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankar Lal (Sri) vs Iiird Additional District Judge ...
Judges: V Nath
24 November, 2004·2. Dispute relates to shop described as No. 7/25, Subhash Road, Aligarh. The original owner and landlord was Vichitra Behari. The premises was in tenancy of Sri Jugal Kishore, who died sometime in August 1998. On the death of Sri Jugal Kishore, the landlord Vichitra Bihari filed an application for d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Smt. Shashi Modi
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
24 November, 2004·2. The reference relates to the assessment year 1976-77. 3. Briefly stated the facts involved in the present case are as under : The previous year ended on March 31, 1976. The respondent got married on November 25, 1975. In her return she had disclosed that she had jewellery worth Rs. 73,887 as on M...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Gayatri Devi vs Civil Judge [Sr. Div.] And Ors.
Judges: S Harkauli, S Yadav
23 November, 2004·2. This writ petition has been filed with the principal prayer that a civil suit of 1999 should be directed to be disposed of within three months by the trial Court. 3. It appears from a large number of writ petitions coming up before us with similar prayers, that litigants have somehow got the impr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhotey Lal And Anr. vs Up-Zila ...
Judges: V Misra
23 November, 2004·3. This writ petition arises out of the proceedings under Section 161, U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) regarding plot No. 13 of Gaon Sabha admeasuring .069 acre, situated in village Chahainya, challenging the impugned orders dated 20.12.1997 passed by respondent No. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sohan Lal (Sri) vs Xith Additional District Judge ...
Judges: V Nath
23 November, 2004·2. Respondent No. 3 is the landlady of house No. E-46, Khapra Mohal, Kanpur. It was in the tenancy of the petitioner. During the pendency of the petition both the petitioner and respondent No. 3 had died and their heirs have been brought on record. The respondent No. 3 filed an application in 1981 u...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nagar Mahapalika Through Mukhya ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: V Misra
23 November, 2004·1. Sri Nishant Mehrotra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.K. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for respondents No. 1 and 3 are present. No one is present on behalf of the legal heirs and representatives of the respondent No. 2- workman, who have been impleaded by way of substitution in h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ase Mohd. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: S Harkauli, S Yadav
23 November, 2004·3. There arose some dispute regarding the payment for the work done by the petitioner under the contract. 4. The petitioner has made a representation to the Executive Engineer, copy of which has been filed as Annexure-9 to this writ petition. The representation relates to the same dispute which is c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.