Bachcha Prasad S/O Ram Nandan vs State Of U.P. And Jagannath Dubey ...
Judges: A Saran
10 November, 2004·3. There is no substance in this contention of the learned counsel for the applicant because for a long time the applicant himself was preferring one revision after the another and thereafter a writ petition, which were all dismissed by the courts including the High Court. 4. The second contention o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kailash Narain Agnihotri vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta, V Nath
10 November, 2004·12. In the instant case, no order was ever passed and the Ordinance automatically lapsed after expiry of its tenure. Ordinance No. 10 of 1985 though promulgated on 27.4.1985 was made operative w.e.f. 22.10.1984 i.e., the date on which the Ordinance No. 19 of 1984 had come into force. Thus, it supers...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Badri Nath Ganga Ram
Judges:
10 November, 2004·It was submitted that the partnership being in violation of section 30 of the Partnership Act cannot be registered under the Income Tax Act. It was further submitted that the minor was also made liable to the extent of his share in the firm, which is violative of section 30 of the Partnership Act. T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabir Rice Mill, vs Ito
Judges:
10 November, 2004·4. learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant had valued the closing stock on the average cost price which is well accepted principle of valuation and, therefore, no addition was called for. Sri Shambhoo Chopra, learned standing counsel, has, however, submitted that the closi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Hanuman Rice Mills
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
10 November, 2004·1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Lucknow, has referred the following two questions under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as "the Act"), for the opinion to this court : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the cir...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lalman Kapoor (Dead) Through L.R. ... vs Raj Narain Kapoor (Dead) Through ...
Judges: N Mehrotra
10 November, 2004·(3) Whether a registered sale deed with respect to the property in question having come into existence on 8.4.1958 and the suit having been filed beyond 12 years, the provisions contained in Article 61 (b) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 will not apply to the instant case? (4) Whether in a transa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs R.T. Lawrence
Judges:
10 November, 2004·5. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that living allowance was not income liable to tax under section 56 as income from other sources?' 2. The assessment year 1978-79 is involved in the present case, the facts of the case are as follows: 2. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Janki Das Lachchmi Narain vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: R Agarwal, P Krishna
10 November, 2004·(iv) Hemalatha Gargya v. CTT [2003] 259 ITR 1 (SC). 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we find that in respect of the assessment year 1993-94 the petitioner had filed an appeal along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay before the Income-ta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Badri Nath Ganga Ram
Judges: R Agarwal, P Krishna
10 November, 2004·4. Heard Sri A. N. Mahajan, learned counsel for the Department, and Sri S. B. L. Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent. 5. It was submitted that the partnership being in violation of Section 30 of the Partnership Act cannot be registered under the Income-tax Act. It was further submitted th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Electricity Board And ... vs Mahesh Chandra Sharma And Anr.
Judges: V Shukla
10 November, 2004·3. To this writ petition counter-affidavit has been filed, and therein it has been contended that respondent workman had worked for 265 days and details of the said work have also been sought to be disclosed before this Court. Rejoinder affidavit has also been filed, and therein statement of fact me...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.