Triloki Chandra Lal (T.C. Lal) vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, K Ojha
10 May, 2004·2. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 3. We have carefully perused the impugned judgment of the learned single Judge and find no infirmity in the same. 4. Admittedly according to petitioner's High School certificate and Service Book record he was to retire on 31.1.1997 on completing the age of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Daya Shanker vs Rent Control And Eviction Officer ...
Judges: T Agarwala
10 May, 2004·2. The petitioner in his application submitted that his need for the room was genuine and bona fide and that the room was required for the members of his family. It was stated that one of his sons had got married and that he required a separate room for himself and for his wife. The daughter had als...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nankoo And Anr. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: M Prasad
10 May, 2004·6. On 17-4-1993, both the accused were charged under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Act to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. 7. In order to substantiate its allegations, the prosecution examined P. W.I H. C. Khayali Ram, P. W. 2 constable Ram Bali and P. W. 3 S. I. Asha Ram Verma, I. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagannath And Ors. vs Additional Commissioner And Ors.
Judges: A Tandon
10 May, 2004·4. Reliance has been placed upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in AIR 1985 SC 606, 1997 (1) SCC 261, 2002 ACJ 2367 and 1996 ALR (27) 217. On the strength of the aforesaid judgments, it is contended that sufficient grounds as contained in Section 5 of the Limitation Act must be ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Main Pal Singh vs Second Additional District Judge ...
Judges: A Tandon
10 May, 2004·5. The petitioner put the Judgment and decree of the trial court to execution, which was numbered as Execution Case No. 76 of 1977 against defendant No. 1 only. When his appeal was allowed, a fresh Execution Case No. 54 of 1978 against all the defendants including Sri Dhyan Singh was filed. In the s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandpur Sugar Co. Ltd. vs Commissioner, Sales Tax
Judges: P Krishna
07 May, 2004·24. Reduction gear and its spare parts. 25. Springs. 26. Lathe machine, shaper, planner, drilling machine, grinders bands of machine, anvil, bench-vicsa. 27. Steam valves, pressure tubes. 28. Centrifugal machine. 29. D.S.M. screen. 30. Filter presses for sugar factory. 31. Sulphur burner. 32. De-sup...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinay Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri ... vs The District Inspector Of Schools ...
Judges: S Ambwani
07 May, 2004·3. The Islamia Intermediate College, Firozabad is a minority institution recognized under the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and the U.P. High Schools & Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and others Employees) Act, 1971. There was a long drawn management disp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Barkhu And Ors. vs Vth Additional District Judge And ...
Judges: A Tandon
07 May, 2004·5. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the sole relief prayed for in the plaint was for cancellation of the registered sale-deed as well as the gift deed. Thus, in view of the Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, the Civil Court had jurisdiction to cancel the said document. In support...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Kumar vs Amarjeet Singh And Ors.
Judges: T Agarwala
07 May, 2004·14. Admittedly, the auction was conducted by a private auctioneer on 23-6-1977 and the plaintiffs bid was the highest. He also paid a certain amount by way of earnest money. The sale deed was to be executed after obtaining necessary permission from the ceiling authorities. The provisions of Section ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shakti Narain Singh vs Anoop Singh And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, R Tripathi
07 May, 2004·3. In Shri Shekhar Transport Co., Etawah v. Managing Director, U.P. Raj Bhandaran Nigam, 2003 (3) AWC 2287 a Division Bench held that a time- bound auction cannot be extended as this extension violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. 4. In A.S. Advertising Co., Meerut v. Nagar Nigam, M...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.