Smt. Ganga Devi W/O Sri Sannaram vs The Chairman/Executive Officer, ...
Judges: V Saran
23 March, 2004·1. The petitioner was appointed as a Sweeper on Class IV post in the Nagar Palika Parishad Shikohabad, District Firozabad and was subsequently confirmed in service. On attaining the age of superannuation, the petitioner retired from service on 31.1.1998. After completing all the formalities, the pap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nadim Ahmad And Ors. vs Regional Secretary, High School ...
Judges: A Kumar
23 March, 2004·1. The petitioners who are 36 in number appeared in Intermediate Examination in the year 1996 conducted by the respondents. It is further alleged that these petitioners appeared in the entire examination, solved question and on every day their presence was noted on the relevant register and after so...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashiq Beg vs State Of U.P.
Judges: S Agarwal
22 March, 2004·2. Brief facts of this case are that Ashiq Beg son of Wajid Beg was granted a licence for 15 acres of land for cultivation in village Baibaha, P. S. Katra, district Shahjahanpur. He cultivated opium, according to the prosecution, over 13 acres of land (.13 hectare). According to Section 19 of the Op...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hanif Khan vs Viiith Additional District Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
22 March, 2004·1. This is tenant's writ petition. Petitioner on 18th June, 1973 filed application for allotment of the accommodation in dispute. In Para 1 of the writ petition it is stated that it was actually given on rent to him by landlord-respondent No. 4 w.e.f., 1st July, 1973. It appears that the matter of a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subhash Prasad Son Of Shiv Ratan ... vs Regional Selection Committee ...
Judges: S Srivastava, G Dass
19 March, 2004·8. Taking into consideration the provisions contained in U.P. Act No. 5 of 1982 and the Rules of 1995, the learned Single Judge expressed the view that the intention appeared to be that where the vacancy was to be filled up by way of promotion, the date on which the vacancy occurred should be constr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vimal Kumar Singh Son Of Sri Raj ... vs Central Administrative Tribunal ...
Judges: S Srivastava, U Pandey
19 March, 2004·3. The revisional authority, vide its judgment and order dated 12.10.1993, taking a lenient view and modifying the major penalty of dismissal from service imposed on the petitioner had reduced the same to the penalty of compulsory retirement. 4. It may be noticed that even the revising authority had...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hem Chandra Jain vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, R Tripathi
19 March, 2004·3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. The petitioners were issued a show cause notice dated 5.12.2002 vide Annexure-1 to the petition. In this notice it was alleged that acting on the basis of some information, the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Lucknow and Varanasi reach...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Moradabad Development ... vs Sri Sushil Tyagi Son Of Sri D.K. ...
Judges: M Katju, R Tripathi
19 March, 2004·2. This case reveals a shocking state of affairs and discloses the wide spread malaise which has infected a section of the subordinate judiciary of the State, and which is bringing the entire judiciary of Uttar Pradesh to disrepute. The citizens of this country still respect the judiciary but the ju...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Basudeo Lal Srivastava (D) ... vs Punjab National Bank
Judges: T Agarwala
18 March, 2004·6. Heard Sri H.N. Singh, the learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant and Sri K.L. Grover, the learned counsel for the defendant bank. 7. The present second appeal was admitted, on the following substantial questions of law, namely : (1) Whether the court below erred in ignoring the date of birth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brijesh Kumar Shukla S/O Late K.P. ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principle ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
18 March, 2004·3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Pushpendra Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2. 4. The question does arise as to whether petitioners were less than 35 years of age on. 1.7.2001. In addition to the advertisement, the statutory Rules provide for elig...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.