Dr. Hemand Kumar Taneja vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: K Ojha
31 March, 2004·9. After hearing the parties the 1st Additional Sessions Judge passed order on 21.8.1999 that in view of suicide notes Indira Taneja committed suicide and accused was not responsible for it. It was also held that there was no mention of any harassment or exercise of any cruelty in respect of dowry, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Limited vs Nagar Palika Parishad
Judges: M Katju, R Tripathi
31 March, 2004·4. The plaintiff appellant has urged that on the road in question the plaintiff appellant has set up three lanes and footpath in 1983 on the advice of the S.D.M., Kairana. It is alleged that the then Chairman of the Municipal Board, Shamli gave permission on 12.7.1989 to the plaintiff to set up pole...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yogesh Sharma, S/O Shiv Dutt ... vs Suresh Chandra Kausik, S/O Late ...
Judges: K Ojha
31 March, 2004·3. Petitioner No. 1 Yogesh Sharma is father of Km. Posya petitioner No. 2 aged about 9 years. Yogesh Sharma is lecturer in Chemical Engineering in P.M.V. Polytechnic College, Mathura. Smt. Anita mother of Km. Posya is no more alive. Respondent No. 1 Suresh Chandra Kausik is father of Anita who was m...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravi Krishna Verma vs Committee Of Management, Chutki ...
Judges: D P Singh
29 March, 2004·"10 (2) Court may strike out or add parties.-The Court may at- any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party, and on such terms as may appear to the Court to be just, order that the name of any party improperly joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant, be stru...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Essential Oil And Chemicals, ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And The ...
Judges: M Katju, R Tripathi
29 March, 2004·5. In that notice the petitioner was asked to show cause why reassessment be not done under Section 21. It is alleged that the aforesaid notice was issued consequent to the circular of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. that Dementholised oil and Mentha oil are one and the same commodity vide circu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India (Uoi) Through Chief ... vs Gupta Constructions, Engineers ...
Judges: M Katju, R Tripathi
29 March, 2004·3. We have heard the learned counsels for the appellant and respondent at length and have also gone through the material available on record. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant has argued that the contractor-respondent had advanced 16 claims whereas the appellant Union of India placed 6 claims...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yogendra Mishra S/O Sri Raj Narain ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: R Deepak
29 March, 2004·2. I have heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Ripu Daman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 3. The petitioner/accused did not put in appearance in the court right from the recording of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulab Chandra vs Lachhmi Chandra Jain
Judges: A Kumar
26 March, 2004·1. This second appeal was heard by this Court on 26th March, 2004 and after hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, the same was dismissed for the reasons to be recorded later on. Now here are the reasons for dismissing the aforesaid second appeal. 2. The judgment debtor filed an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Mohammad Tahir vs State Of U.P. And Ors. [Alongwith ...
Judges: T Chatterjee, R Agrawal, A Bhushan
25 March, 2004·30. This is in accordance with the maxim", namely, verba relate hoc maxime operantur per ferentiaum ut in eis inesse videntur (words to which reference is made seem to be incorporated) words to which reference is made in an instrument have the same operation as if they were inserted in the instrumen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manjoor Ali And Anr. vs Kishmat Ali And Ors.
Judges: T Agarwala
24 March, 2004·1. Whether the sale deed dated 16-5-1933 conferred no right upon the plaintiff appellants ? 2. Whether the presumption under Section 90(2) of the Evidence Act was available to the certified copy of the sale deed dated 16-5-1933 ? 3. Whether the presumption under Section 90(2) of the Evidence Act wil...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.