Gulab Chand Verma vs Badri Narain Mishra
Judges: S Khan
30 July, 2004·5. The defendant took the plea that the partition deed dated 4.2.1973 (termed as memorandum of partition by the plaintiff) was not admissible in evidence for want of registration. It was also pleaded that Yogendra one of the brothers of plaintiff who was also a co-owner of the house transferred his ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs Janardan Mishra And Ors.
Judges: T Agarwala
30 July, 2004·4. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the Insurance Company is only liable to pay the compensation, provided, the driver of the vehicle had a valid driving licence. Since the owner of the vehicle did not produce the driving licence, the Insurance Company was not liable to pay the c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pt. Lashkari Ram vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
30 July, 2004·The assessee thereafter filed an application before the CIT, Allahabad, under Section 273A of the Act for waiver of penalty and interest. That application led the CIT to hold an inquiry. The CIT called for the reports of the ITO on the said application. Another comprehensive report was called by the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
High Court Bar Association, ... vs Deputy Labour Commissioner And ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
30 July, 2004·3. In our opinion this special appeal deserves to be allowed on the short point that the Payment of Gratuity Act, does not apply to the High Court Bar Association at all : "Section 1(3) of the Payment of Gratuity Act states : (3) It shall apply to- (a) every factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahmatullah And Ors. vs Civil Judge (Senior Division) And ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
30 July, 2004·14. In Sankarnarayanan Potti v. K. Sreedevi and Ors., (1998) 3 SCC 751, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as under : "It is obvious that in all types of civil disputes, civil courts have inherent jurisdiction as per Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure unless a part of that jurisdiction is carv...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Navin Singh vs Smt. Jyoti Parashar And Anr.
Judges: A Bhushan
30 July, 2004·8. Shri Madhav Jain, learned counsel appearing for the respondent refuting the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner contended that application under Section 25 was fully maintainable. He contended that mother is guardian and the child having been removed from the custody of mother, applica...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bua Ram Shukla And Ors. vs District Inspector Of Schools And ...
Judges: A Tandon
30 July, 2004·3. This Court while entertaining the writ petition on 28.6.2004 passed and order that the elections pursuant to the notice dated 23.6.2004 (Annexure 9 to the writ petition) may be held but the result of the election will not be declared. An application (C.M. Application No. 126805 of 2004) has been ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Swarup Bajpayee vs Joint Director Of Education And ...
Judges: T Agarwala
30 July, 2004·2. The District Inspector of Schools has rejected the petitioner's claim on two grounds, namely, (1) The State Government had imposed a ban on fresh appointment by Government Order dated 30.7.1991 and, therefore, no appointment could have been made by the Committee of Management on 9.8.1991, (2) the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharat Pump And Compressors ... vs Jagdish Singh And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
30 July, 2004·3. Aggrieved with the aforesaid judgment and order, the present intra Court appeal has been preferred. 4. We have heard Sri. Manish Goyal, learned Counsel for the appellant and Sri K.P. Agrawal, who has put in appearance for the petitioners-respondents. 5. At the very outset, it has been mentioned b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Controller Of Estate Duty vs Ram Lal Agarwal (Decd.) Through ...
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
30 July, 2004·On further appeal, the learned Tribunal has accepted the contention of the accountable person. The Tribunal has held that this amount of Rs. 55,350 represented a liability by the deceased and the amount was liable to be deducted from the value of the estate. The Tribunal also held that this deductio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.