Arjun vs Deputy Director Of Education Ivth ...
Judges: T Agarwala
24 August, 2004·2. Heard Sri I.N. Singh, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of the District Inspector of Schools dated 22.9,1976 reverting the petitioner from the post of L.T. Grade to the post of C.T. Grade was wholly illegal inasmuch as the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sharda Sahu (Smt.) And Anr. vs Additional District Judge And ...
Judges: N Mehrotra
24 August, 2004·2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the opposite party No. 3. 3. Suit No. 363 of 1956 filed by Chandrika Prasad and others (plaintiffs) was decided in favour of Chandrika Prasad by passing a decree and an Appeal No. 53 of 1963 was filed which was heard...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Harsh Deo Narain Singh And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
24 August, 2004·7. A similar view has been reiterated by another Constitution Bench in Trilok Chandra Moti Chandra and Ors. v. H.B. Munshi, AIR 1990 SC 898, however, the Hon'ble Apex Court cautioned that a Writ Court should entertain a writ petition in rare case's, where the ordinary process of law appears ineffica...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amar Deep Singh Jadon Son Of ... vs Bank Of India Through Its Chman ...
Judges: R Misra
24 August, 2004·M-8 : Original loan application under IRDP of Smt. Maur Shree W/o Sri Sri Ram. M-9 : Original written statement dated 31.10.91 signed by staff members recording incidence of 29.10.91. M-10: Original written statement dated 8.1.92 of Shri S.K. Sinha, Agr. Officer of Kusmera Branch addressed to the In...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In Re: Danin Leather Ltd. (In ... vs Unknown
Judges: S Mehrotra
23 August, 2004·4. It is, inter-alia. prayed in the said application that the personal appearance of the opposite parties Nos. 2 to 6 be exempted, and the opposite parties Nos. 2 to 6 be permitted to appear through their Counsel. 5. The said application is supported by an affidavit of Sanjay Mahajan (Opposite Party...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ankit Soni And Anr. vs Ram Ji
Judges: J Sahai
23 August, 2004·2. The trial court proceeded to decide the suit on merits. It held that the burden of proof of issue No. 1, which was to the effect whether the sale deed dated 25.7.1992 was liable to be declared as void on the grounds in the plaint was upon the plaintiff. It then proceeded to discuss the plaintiffs...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sharda Refrigeration Co. (P.) ... vs Gupta Gasoline Distributor
Judges: S Mehrotra
23 August, 2004·13. It is, inter alia, further stated in the Winding Up Petition that vide letter dated 9-12-1995, the respondent company in order to avoid legal action requested the petitioner to grant further time till 9th January, 1996 for payment of the settled amount. 14. Copy of the said letter dated 9th Janu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raina (Smt.) vs Hari Mohan Budhaulia
Judges: S Srivastava
23 August, 2004·2. Learned Counsel for petitioner urged that Km. Muniya and Chuniya are minor daughters of late Alok Kumar Budhaulia. They are also entitled to get maintenance along with their mother. Their application for impleadment was wrongly rejected by the Courts below. Impugned orders are liable to be quashe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharat Singh (D.) Through L.Rs. vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: K Murari
20 August, 2004·6. Sri S. K. Mehrotra appearing for the respondents has contended that the Deputy Director of Consolidation has rightly dismissed the revision for want of substitution and non-impleadment of necessary parties. 7. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and per...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Smt. Madhuri Saxena vs Vth Addl. D.J. And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
20 August, 2004·(1) Whether the plaintiffs are not entitled to sue? (2) Whether the provisions of Act No. XIII of 1972 are not applicable? (3) Whether the tenancy of the defendant is terminated? If so, its effect? (4) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to claim the pendente lite and future mesne profits? 3. The re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.