Chandra Kant Bhardwaj S/O Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
04 August, 2004·1. Heard Shri R.N. Singh and G.K. Singh learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel,for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has prayed that he should be promoted on the basis of the recommendation of the Departmental Promotion Committee dated 27.8.2001 to the post of Joint Excise ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar Goyal vs Income Tax Settlement Commission
Judges:
04 August, 2004·The petitioner is an individual. The petitioner, according to him is engaged in the business of job work of manufacture of silver chains upon orders received from customers. He had 536 kilograms (net) of silver which he had sold during the financial year 1992-93 for a total sum of Rs. 41,78,937. Acc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Badri Prasad (D.) Through L.Rs. ... vs Satya Dev
Judges: A Kumar
04 August, 2004·(1) Whether plaintiff alone is 'sarvarakar' of the temple in dispute and has right over the offerings made therein? (2) Whether the suit is barred by Section 11 of the C.P.C.? (3) Whether the suit is barred by estoppel? (4) Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder? (5) Whether the suit is not in time...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. vs The Labour Court And Anr.
Judges: A Kumar
04 August, 2004·2. The following dispute was referred to the Labour Court for adjudication : "KYA SEWAYOJAKON DWARA APNE KARMCHARI SHRI MUJIB AHMAD (PUTRA SHRI KHAN MOHAMMAD) KO SEASON 1973- 74 KE ARAMBH HONE Kl TITHI 7-12-73 KO KARYA PAR NA LIYA JANA UCHIT TATHA/ATHWA VAIDHANlK HAL YADI NAHIN TO SAMBANDHIT KARMCHA...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar Goyal vs Income-Tax Settlement ...
Judges: R Agarwal, K Ojha
04 August, 2004·2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows : 3. The petitioner is an individual. The petitioner, according to him is engaged in the business of job work of manufacture of silver chains upon orders received from customers. He had 536 kilograms (net) of silver which...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Shakooran Begum And Ors. vs Mohd. Waris And Ors.
Judges: P Krishna
04 August, 2004·8. Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 Mohd. Waris and Naseem Ahmad besides filing the aforesaid second appeal in this Court, also filed an application before the court below for reviewing its judgment and decree under appeal. The court below by the impugned order dated 5th August, 1994, allowed the review appli...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kishore Son Of Sri Nathwa vs Sri O.P. Tewari, Superintending ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
04 August, 2004·5. Relevant portion of the said order dated 10.5.1994 is quoted below: Accordingly , the writ petition succeeds and is allowed. The impugned orders dated 25.10.1989 and 23.10.1989 passed by respondents 1 and 2 respectively (Annexures 8 and 9 respectively) are quashed with liberty reserved to the res...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vishal Panda And Anr. vs District Magistrate And Ors.
Judges: V Sahai, G Gupta
04 August, 2004·2. The prejudicial activities of the petitioner-detenu impelling the first respondent to clamp the impugned detention order against him are contained in grounds of detention. Since in our view a reference to them is not necessary for the adjudication of the pleadings contained in paragrahs 25, 26 an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Kumari Gupta Wife Of Late ... vs Hameeda Bibi Wife Of Safiullah And ...
Judges: P Krishna
04 August, 2004·8. The learned Counsel for the appellant challenged the finding recorded by the Court below and submitted that the Court below has very conveniently overlooked the voluminous documents on record to show that by means of the sale deed dated 29th August 1919, land admeasuring 4 bighas 2 biswas was sol...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nasruddin vs Additional Commissioner, ...
Judges: K Kishore
04 August, 2004·2. I have heard arguments and have gone through the record. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the opposite-parties that the alternative remedies have already been availed of by the parties before the learned S.D.M. etc. in appeal, hence the present petition under Article 226 of the Co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.