Hari Ram vs Collector And Ors.
Judges: A Bhushan
10 August, 2004·12. Before considering the above mentioned submissions, it is necessary to take note of the relevant provisions of the Act relating to asami lease. 13. Section 133A of the Act mentions four clauses of asami. Asami leases in the present writ petitions are referable to Section 133 (c) which is with re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Appollo Textiles Agency
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
10 August, 2004·1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad has referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of this Court : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the assessee's cla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Kumar Yadav Son Of Late Narain ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: A Bhushan
10 August, 2004·3. Brief facts necessary for deciding the controversy raised in the writ petition are; petitioner is a fair price shop dealer. On the basis of inspection dated 30th August, 2001, the fair price agreement of the petitioner was suspended. The petitioner submitted his reply on 19th August, 2001 on whic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, ... vs Amar Nath Gupta And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
10 August, 2004·1. This Special Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of learned Single Judge dated 30.7.2004. 2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have perused the impugned order. 3. The question in this case is that if both husband and wife arc in service whether they both arc en...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax vs Smt. Angoori Devi And Ors.
Judges: R Agarwal, K Ojha
10 August, 2004·"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, each of the assessees for each of the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77 was entitled to the deduction permissible under Section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, in respect of the immovable property belonging to the firm of M/s. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, Shaoul ... vs Commissioner, Azamgarh Division ...
Judges: A Tandon
10 August, 2004·4. The Committee of Management Shaoul Uloom Educational Society, Karmaini, Post Office Rauanapar, Tehsil Sagri, district Azamgarh (hereinafter referred to as the Committee of Management) with its alleged Secretary-cum-Manager Sri Abdul Kavi, has filed the present writ petition against the order of A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indra Pal Mishra Alias Raju Son Of ... vs Special Judge (E.C. Act), ...
Judges: K Murari
10 August, 2004·3. The facts in brief are that the petitioner was served with a notice dated 5.3.1984 under Section 29 read with Section 30 of the Act stating that he holds 32.84 Acre of irrigated land and as such 3.79 acres of irrigated land is surplus with him. The petitioner filed objection to the said notice. T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arshadi (Smt.) vs Prescribed ...
Judges: A Bhushan
10 August, 2004·On 5.1.2004 recounting of votes took place. The ballot papers were brought before the Court in sealed cover, which was opened in presence of both the parties and recounting memo was also prepared. On recount of votes, election petitioner, Smt. Fahmida, was found to have secured 557 votes whereas Smt...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lallan vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava
09 August, 2004·2. Plaintiff filed Suit No. 90 of 2002 for cancellation of sale deed and for permanent injunction which was decreed ex parte on 14.11.2003. An application filed by defendant to set aside ex parte decree and to restore suit to its original number was entertained by the trial court. Trial court grante...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax vs Yadupat Singhania
Judges: R Agarwal, K Ojha
09 August, 2004·"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct in holding that in determining the value of the shares of J.K. Jute Mills Ltd., under rule ID of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957, deduction was to be allowed in respect of accumulated div...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.