Dalmia Dairy Industries Ltd. vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
22 September, 2003·3. In this case when the petition was filed an interim order was passed on 29.2.88 staying the re-assessment proceedings under section Hie petitioner is a Company registered under the Indian Companies Act, which has a sales depot at Ghaziabad: The: petitioner carries on the business of manufacture a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Harihar Nath Agarwal (P) Family ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
22 September, 2003·3. It is alleged in para. 4 of the writ petition that in pursuance of the order of the CIT(A) dt. 21st March, 1988 the ITO was required to pass a fresh order within two years from the date of the order of the CIT(A), but the ITO did not pass any such order, and hence the assessment has become time-b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gulab Singh vs Labour Court And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
19 September, 2003·^^D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk vius Jfed xqykc flag iq= Jh jke dju flag] in [email protected] lgk;d dh lsok;sa fnukad 14-11-1986 ls lekIr fd;k tkuk vuqfpr [email protected] voS/kkfud gS\ ;fn gk¡] rks lEcfU/kr Jfed D;k ykHk ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS] rFkk vU; fdl fooj.k lfgr \** 3. Heard learned Counsel appearing...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hazari Lal vs Ist Additional District Judge And ...
Judges: N Mehrotra
19 September, 2003·4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred me the adoption deed, the Photostat copy of which has been filed along with the rejoinder-affidavit. The learned counsel for the opposite parties referred to this Court a copy of the affidavit of Desh Raj filed in Writ Petition No. 3414 (R/C) of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Ram Murti And Ors.
Judges: R Tiwari
19 September, 2003·6. The petitioners filed an appeal under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act before the District Judge, Bareilly challenging the order dated 29.7.1991, passed by the Prescribed Authority/Assistant Labour Commissioner, Bareilly in P.W. Case Nos. 3 of 1985 and 12 of 1985. It was registered as Payme...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudha Singh And Ors. vs State Transport Appellate ...
Judges: N Mehrotra
19 September, 2003·5. After hearing, learned counsel for the parties and perusal of the record, I find that the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution for not depositing the appeal fees even after granting the several opportunities to the appellants. The case of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that their ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madhya Bharat Transport Carrier vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
19 September, 2003·Section 28-B. Transit of goods by road through the State and issue of authorisation for transit of goods.--When a vehicle coming from any place outside the State and bound for any other place outside the State, and carrying goods referred to in Sub-section (1) of Section 28-A, passes through the Sta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner, Sales Tax vs Central Finance Accounts And ...
Judges: R Kumar
19 September, 2003·1. This revision is directed against the order of Tribunal dated July 6,1991 for assessment year 1984-85 arising from the proceeding under Section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the assessment year 1984-85, the respondent had purchased machines wor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jit & Pal X-Rays (P) Ltd. vs Cit
Judges:
18 September, 2003·4. Before dealing with the first point referred to us we may quote para 4 of the sale deed dated 12-11-1977 between Dr. Harnam Singh and the assessee-company. Copy of which is Annexure 2 to the paper book. Para 4 states : 4. Before dealing with the first point referred to us we may quote para 4 of t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs U.P. Paschimi Kshetriya Vikas ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
18 September, 2003·3. The assessee gave tractors on hire. These tractors were fitted with trolleys and they were exclusively used for hiring purpose by the assessee. The assessee claimed investment allowance on these tractors. 4. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner did not allow the claim for investment allowance as...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.