Suresh Singh (In Jail) vs State
Judges: U Tripathi, V Singh
12 September, 2003·The third aspect considered by the learned trial Court is statement of P.W. 2 Ram Bharose, who had seen the accused/ appellant running away to the east with pistol just after firing; and . Fourth aspect, which was considered by the learned trial Court was that accused had made extra judicial confess...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ejaz Ahmad And Ors. vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. ...
Judges: R Kumar
12 September, 2003·3. Heard Sri M. P. Sarraf, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri S. K. Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent Insurance Company. 4. A short question which rise for consideration in the present appeal is whether the vehicle No. U.P.-77/9493 was insured from 1.10.1991 to 30.9.1992 as claimed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gas Authority Of India Through Its ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
12 September, 2003·5. We fully agree with the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellant. In our opinion, the Government Order of the State Government is not binding on the appellant, as it is a Public Sector Undertaking wholly owned and control by the Central Government. 6. It is not denied that the petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanti Swaroop Agarwal vs U.P. State Road Transport ...
Judges: P Krishna
12 September, 2003·8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 9. The question which falls for determination in the present appeal is whether in the facts and circumstances of the case it can be said that the respondents were negligent and are liable to pay damages for the injury suffered by the c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamla Trust vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: R Kumar
12 September, 2003·2. The applicant was manufacturer of rice. The paddy was raw material for the manufacturing of rice. Being the manufacturer, the applicant was holding recognition certificate Under Section 4-B of the Act. During the year under consideration, applicant had purchased paddy from registered dealer to th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indra Dhanush vs State Election Commission
Judges: T Chatterjee, N Mehrotra
12 September, 2003·7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further referred Tata Cellular v. Union of India. (1994) 6 SCC 651. In this case, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down the scope of judicial review in the cases of Government contracts. It has been held that only the decision making process and not the me...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alok Kumar Dixit vs District Inspector Of Schools And ...
Judges: A Bhushan
12 September, 2003·4. The Counsel for the petitioner challenging the order of the District Inspector of Schools raised following submissions : (1) The Committee of Management was fully empowered to make appointment on short term vacancies in accordance with the provisions of U.P. Secondary Education Services Commissio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hanoman Prasad Mishra vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: A Varma
11 September, 2003·3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy, 1999 (1) AWC 15 (SC) : (1998) 7 SCC 123. The Apex Court in paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 of the said judgment observed as follows : "9.. It is axiomatic that condonation of delay is a matter of discreti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Thermal Power ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: J Bhalla, G Dass
11 September, 2003·3. The main ground of attack is that the petitioner had neither been issued any notice nor offered any opportunity of adducing the evidence as required under the mandatory provisions contained in Section 52(2) of the said Act. The non-compliance of the aforesaid section makes the award illegal and l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
J.H.V. Sugar Corporation Ltd. vs Chief Controlling Revenue ...
Judges: A Bhushan
11 September, 2003·8. The counsel for both the parties have relied on various decisions which shall be referred while dealing with their respective submissions. 9. The first and second submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, being interrelated, are taken together. Before coming to the submissions made by couns...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.