Ravindra Nath Rai vs The District Inspector Of Schools ...
Judges: R Misra
28 November, 2003·4. Similar view has been reiterated in Vithal N. Shetti and Anr. v. Prakash N. Rudrakar and Ors., (2003) 1 SCC 18. 5. In Re : Sanjiv Datta, (1995) 3 SCC 619, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has also observed as under : "Some members of the profession have been adopting perceptibly casual approach to the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner, Sales Tax vs Hari Oil And General Mills
Judges: R Kumar
28 November, 2003·5............................... 6. The phrase 'falsely represents' in Section 10(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 indicates that mens rea is an essential ingredient for the offences contemplated under Section 10(b) of the Act. In the present case, the doctrine of mens rea is permanently absent...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukesh Chand Verma vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: U Pandey
28 November, 2003·2. It is alleged by the opposite party No. 2 that she was married to the revisionist in the year 1995 and as per their status her parents solemnized this marriage to the satisfaction of everbody. Subsequently there was demand of dowry, which culminated into some dispute between the parties. It is al...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish (D.) Through L.Rs. vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: S Singh
28 November, 2003·3. Parties' counsel have been heard at some length, 4. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Consolidation Officer by giving finding about possession of the petitioner in 1359 fasli has accepted his rights and, therefore, it was obligatory on the part of the Settlement Officer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Director, Motilal Nehru National ... vs Anu Shri Shukla And Anr.
Judges: S Srivastava, A Bhushan
27 November, 2003·7. We have considered the submission of counsel for both the parties and have perused the record. There is no dispute that seven seats were vacant and the names of respondent-writ petitioners were included in the list of 211 candidates at serial Nos. 179 and 130. The case of the appellant is that si...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mathura Vrindavan Development ... vs State Public Services Tribunal ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
25 November, 2003·2. None has appeared for the respondent No. 2 although, Sri Dev Pratap Singh, advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No. 2 and his name has been shown in the cause list. 3. The facts of the case have been set out in the order dated 26.10.1999 passed by the U. P. Public Servic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Paramount Bio-Tech Industries ... vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: M Katju, R Tripathi
25 November, 2003·21. In paragraph 32 of the petition it is mentioned that the accounting norms as specified in Schedule IX of the impugned regulations suffers from certain discrepancies mentioned in that paragraph. It is alleged that all these minor and major flaws in the impugned regulations are because the impugne...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudhakar Rai vs Superintending Engineer, 34Th ...
Judges: A Bhushan
25 November, 2003·7. Before considering the submissions of counsel for the petitioner, it is necessary to consider the preliminary objection of the respondents regarding laches in filing the writ petition. The learned standing counsel has placed reliance on the Judgment of the Apex Court in S.S. Rathore v. State of M...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhedi Lal Singh vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: D Singh
25 November, 2003·4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised two submissions in support of this petition. Firstly, automatic loss of lien under the Standing Orders was hit by Article 14 of the Constitution of India and secondly, there being no guidelines for choice of exercise of power between the power providi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nusrat Abbas vs U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad And ...
Judges: N Mehrotra
25 November, 2003·7. The opposite party No. 3 has also filed a counter-affidavit. It has been contended by the opposite party No. 3 that the petitioner challenged the vires of the original service regulations in Writ Petition No. 370 (S/B) of 2001 while the said Regulations of 1999 have been amended by U.P. Avas Evam...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.