Naeem vs District Magistrate And Ors.
Judges: U Tripathi, V Singh
07 May, 2003·8. Learned counsel for the petitioners raised following points for challenging the detention order :-- (1) The incident in question took place in a close room and two Hindus were also involved in it. It was simply a law and order problem and it had no effect or impact on public order. (2) The ground...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Kala Kumari vs Ram Bhawan Anand
Judges: Y Singh, M Prasad
07 May, 2003·8. On the other hand, the husband examined Parag, who is his class follow as D.W. 1, Lakhpat Prasad a resident of adjoining village as DW. 2 and himself as D.W. 3. 9. The husband sought a decree for restitution of conjugal rights mainly on the ground that the wife had withdrawn from his society sinc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
District Cooperative Sugar Cane ... vs State Of U.P., The Presiding ...
Judges: A Kumar
07 May, 2003·2. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the impugned award dated 26.5.1982, passed by Labour Court, U.P., Bareilly in adjudication case No. 206 of 1981, copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-'11' to the writ petition. 3. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rathi Super Steel Limited vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: P Krishna
07 May, 2003·4. The above amendment in the notification was brought to the notice of Tribunal. The Tribunal refused to consider the said amend ment in the notification on the short ground that the said amend ment has come into force during the pendency of appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal was of the view ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Kailash Kumar Dixit (Huf)
Judges: B Chauhan, G Dass
06 May, 2003·1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961. Following question has been referred for the opinion of this Court : "Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in taking the view that a valid partial partition had been effected of the ass...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs The State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
06 May, 2003·1. Heard Sri Sameer Sharma, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the contesting Respondents. 2. In view of the office report dated 25.4.2003, notice of service upon Respondent No.3 has been held sufficient. 3. The petitioner, by means of present ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs J.P. Bhatia
Judges: B Chauhan, G Dass
06 May, 2003·"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in weight to the supplementary deed dated February 1, 1977 ? 2. Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in treating the application for registration in Form No. 11 as contemporaneous e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Kailash Kumar Dixit
Judges:
06 May, 2003·2. Heard Sri Gulati, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Mahajan, learned counsel for revenue. 2. Heard Sri Gulati, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Mahajan, learned counsel for revenue. 3. The learned counsel at bar are in agreement that the matter stands fully covered by the judgment ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Juhi Metal Works
Judges: B Chauhan, G Dass
06 May, 2003·3. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, referring the following two questions : Reference by the Commissioner of Income-tax R. A. No. 431 (Alld) of 1981, assessment year 1976-77 : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: B Chauhan, G Dass
06 May, 2003·4. We have heard Shri Gulati, learned counsel appearing for the assessee, and Shri Shambhoo Chopra, learned standing counsel for the Revenue. 5. It has been submitted by Shri Gulati, on behalf of the assessee, that as the assessing authority did not pass any order to charge interest under Section 21...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.