Raghu Raj Pratap Singh Alias Raja ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: J Bhalla, K Karan
13 March, 2003·(2) The Governor may from time to time : (a) prorogue the House or either House ; (b) dissolve the Legislative Assembly. Article 175, Right of Governor to address and send messages to the House or Houses.--(1) The Governor may address the Legislative Assembly or, in the case of a State having a Legi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raja Ram Chaudhary vs Satya Narain Gupta And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava, M Singh
12 March, 2003·3. The learned single Judge vide the impugned order had directed the District Inspector of Schools, Siddharth Nagar to ensure that the next most senior teacher in the college is handed over charge of the post of Principal within a week of production of a certified copy of the said order before the D...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner, Sales Tax vs Sterling Machine Tools
Judges: R Kumar
12 March, 2003·7. He further submitted that in the case of any conflict between the two decisions of the honourable Supreme Court given by the Judges of equal strength till the decision of later bench is binding and for this, the reliance has been placed on the full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Gopa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Saran And Ors. vs Board Of Revenue And Ors.
Judges: R Zaidi
12 March, 2003·Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 8109 of 1996. Ram Saran and Ors., v. Board of Revenue. U. P. and Ors. : 7. In this petition, learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently urged that the courts below have acted illegally in dismissing the applications filed by Smt. Gomti Devi for condonation of delay ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rukunuddin Khan vs Controller, U.P. Sunni Central ...
Judges: V Sahai, M Prasad
12 March, 2003·2. This petition was filed by Rukunuddin Khan, challenging the order dated 14.6.1995 (Annexure-25 to the writ petition) passed by the Controller of the U. P. Sunni, Central Board of Waqfs, Lucknow and for issuing a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to give effect and not to implem...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Heera Electrodes vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: R Kumar
12 March, 2003·1. That the first party will design, manufacture, fabricate and install the complete machinery and equipments of electrodes plant as per quotations furnished by the first party to the second party, which is annexure I to this agreement. 2. That the costs of electrodes plant so fabricated, supplied, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner, Trade Tax vs Harishanker
Judges: R Agrawal
11 March, 2003·1. The present revision has been filed against the order dated January 21, 1997 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Varansai, in Second Appeal No. 308 of 1997, relating to assessment year 1995-96. 2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the opposite party is acting as ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Kumar Sharma vs Superintendent Of Railway Police ...
Judges: A Kumar
11 March, 2003·3. The petitioner, by means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for the following reliefs : (i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Superintendent of Railway Police, Agra Cantt., Agra (respondent No. 1) not to interfere...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nageshwar Prasad Mishra vs Collector And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
11 March, 2003·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the contesting respondents. 2. The petitioner, by means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has challenged the order dated 18th February, 2003, a copy whereof is Annexure-3 to the writ ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pole-Ads Advertising (P.) Ltd. vs Nagar Nigam And Anr.
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
11 March, 2003·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Prem Chand has appeared for the respondent. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner had been granted a contract for five years from 12.2.1998 to 11.2.2003. This five years period has admittedly expired. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our atte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.