Kwality Moters And Components ... vs Deputy Labour Commissioner And ...
Judges: A Kumar
14 January, 2003·"The lay-off compensation paid under Section 25-C of the Industrial Disputes Act cannot come within the ambit of "salary" or "wage" as defined under Section 2(21) of the Act. The lay-off compensation is evidently not remuneration payable to the employees for work done. During the period of lay-off, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Achchan Miyan vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: B Singh
14 January, 2003·(ii) by promotion through the Commission, from amongst the permanent departmental candidates who have put in at least seven years service in the department. (2) Recruitment from the two sources mentioned in Sub-rule (1) above shall be so arranged that, as for as may be, 75 per cent of the posts in t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santosh Kumar vs State Of U.P. Through Its Joint ...
Judges: A Kumar
14 January, 2003·"The writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that the concerned departmental authorities shall decide the pending application of the petitioner for appointment and shall pass appropriate speaking orders on the pending application of the petitioner under the Rules aforesaid taking int...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Chitra Pandey vs Shyam Vishal Pandey And Anr.
Judges: J Bhalla
14 January, 2003·4. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 28-12-1976 the revisionist preferred a revision (No. 4 of 1976), which was heard and dismissed by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Lucknow by his order dated 31-3-1977. Against the order of the revisional Court dated 31-3-1997 the revisionist filed a petit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deoneria Cold Storage And Ice ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
13 January, 2003·3. The Central Government issued the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme under the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, which came into force from September 1, 1998, and was applicable till January 31, 1999. This scheme provided for settlement of disputed arrears of tax, etc. Section 88 of the aforesaid Finance (No. 2)...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Diploma Engineers Association ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, Y Singh
10 January, 2003·4. The posts in the respondent Corporation have to be sanctioned by the State Government. In paragraph 10 of the petition, it is stated that by Government order dated 11.1.2002 (Annexure-4 to the petition) the State Government sanctioned 79 Group A posts, 81 Group B posts, 444 Group C posts, and 197...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Inder Narayan vs Kishori Saran Gupta And Anr.
Judges: S Mehrotra
10 January, 2003·"Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions statements made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that the inspection of the said multi-storeyed shopping complex will be made by the Prescribed Authority on 17.11.2002, i.e. Sunday subject to the condition...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaiprakash Industries Ltd. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
09 January, 2003·7. The petitioner filed applications Under Section 7-D in respect of the aforesaid three contracts before the assessing authority at NOIDA. True copy of the applications are annexure 7 to the writ petition. 8. For carrying out the aforesaid works contract the petitioner made purchases from within th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indian Council Of Agricultural ... vs Raja Balwant Singh College And ...
Judges: M Katju, Y Singh
09 January, 2003·4. The management of the college terminated the services of the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 on restructuring of the project by letters dated 28.8.1993, Annexures-5 to 8. The respondent Nos. 3 to 6 who were working on the project started claiming regularisation of their services in the Indian Council of A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Poojan Prasad vs District Magistrate And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava
09 January, 2003·1. Present petition has its genesis in the order dated 26.11.2002 passed by the District Magistrate, Chandauli, arrayed as respondent No. 1 and the consequential order dated 29.11.2002 thereby reopening the auction of pond/tank for fisheries rights, comprising in Plot Nos. 609/2, 619, 687 admeasurin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.