Babban Alias Babbu vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: V Sahai, R Pandey
25 February, 2003·The averments contained in paragraph-17 of the petition and ground-K of para-graph-21 thereof are that the petitioner-detenu made representation which has not been dealt with promptitude and sense of urgency and this has resulted in violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India. Mr. Rishad...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Central Warehousing Corporation vs Prabhu Narain Singh And Anr.
Judges: J Sahai
24 February, 2003·4. In the suit an application was filed by the Central Warehousing Corporation praying that the container No. TRI 499102 be given to the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 so that it can be transported to its destination. The application was opposed by the plaintiff. By the order dated 28-11-2002 the trial Cour...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pankaj Gas Cylinders Limited vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
24 February, 2003·1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has challenged the notices dated June 28, 1993 and June 29, 1993 under Section 29-A the of U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (now U.P. Trade Tax Act), for the assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85, annexures 7A and 7B to the writ petition. The petiti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Chandra Singh vs State Of U.P.
Judges: M Jain, K Ojha
24 February, 2003·4. Rigor Mortis was present on both upper and lower extremities, but there was no sign of decomposition. Muscles and vessels were lacerated. Four wadding pieces were found embedded underneath the right clavicle at its medial end and 30 small pellets were embedded in the muscles, vessels and vertebra...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Hind Lamps Ltd.
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
24 February, 2003·The main point pressed by the learned counsel for the Department is that the amount of Rs. 9,82,426 was wrongly allowed by the Tribunal under Section 36(i) and (ii) or Section 37(1) of the IT Act. This question has been discussed in para 5 of the impugned order of the Tribunal. It appears that in th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Hind Lamps Ltd.
Judges:
24 February, 2003·2. It may be mentioned here that under the Payment of Bonus Act, the bonus (which deals with profit bonus) is payable to the employees as a matter of right and it is not sweet will of the employer to pay it or not. The scheme of the Payment of Bonus Act for calculating bonus payable to the workmen i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sewak Coal Depot vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: A Bhushan
21 February, 2003·9. The above section contains an enabling power in the assessing, appellate or revising authority or the Tribunal for rectification of any mistake in its order apparent on the record. The sub-section (1) of Section 22 uses words "mistake". Further the mistake contemplated in section is a mistake whi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Addl. District And Sessions Judge ...
Judges: S Ambwani
21 February, 2003·4. The aforesaid decision was rendered in respect of claim filed under Section 110-A of Motor Vehicles Act. 1939 and in interpretation of Rule 21 of U.P. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 1967 made under the Act, which was amended in 1988 and a new Act, namely. Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Additional District And Sessions ...
Judges: S Ambwani
21 February, 2003·3. The aforesaid decision was rendered in respect of claim filed under Section 110-A pf Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 and in interpretation of Rule 21 of U.P. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Rules, 1967 made under the Act, which was amended in 1988 and a new Act, namely, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 19...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanti Devi And Ors. vs District Deputy Director, ...
Judges: S Srivastava
21 February, 2003·2. Petitioners in the instant petition claim themselves to be the recipient of the land from Bhoodan Yojna Committee, Etah under Section 14 of the U. P. Bhoodan Act, 1952 the pattas in respect of which were alleged to have been executed in the year 1988-89. The validity of the order impugned herein ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.