Kailash Nath S/O Raghunath vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr.
Judges: U Pandey
10 December, 2003·6. The learned counsel for the opposite party has contended that the revisional Court had decided the merit of the order passed by the Magistrate and as such a second revision before this Court is not maintainable. 7. The learned counsel has referred to the case of Dharampal v. Smt. Ramshri, reporte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Itc Limited vs Commissioner (Appeals), Cus. And ...
Judges: B Chauhan, M Khan
10 December, 2003·1. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 14-11-2003 rejecting the application of the petitioner for waiving the pre-deposit condition by the learned Appellate Authority, directing it to deposit an amount of Rs. 1.50 crores on or before 10th December, 2003 and on such compliance, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dasrath Singh Son Of Shiv Sewak ... vs Government Of India, Through ...
Judges: R Misra
10 December, 2003·2. According to the petitioner he was enrolled in the Indian Army on 27.10.1992 and after training and was imparted in Rajput Regiment Centre. The petitioner came across ailment diagnosed as "INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABATES MELLITUS " and also suffered from Impoteney. According to the petitioner he was m...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner, Sales Tax vs Laxmi Leather Cloth Industries ...
Judges: R Kumar
09 December, 2003·3. Textiles of the following varieties manufactured on powerloom, excluding durries, carpets, druggets, hosiery goods, ready-made garments and cotton, rayon or nylon tyre cords and tyre cord warp-sheets, but including the goods specified in the annexure hereunder: (a) Cotton fabrics of all varieties...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Syed Mazhar Hussain vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava
09 December, 2003·2. The brief resume of necessary facts is that the trial court in a suit filed by the petitioner under Section 229D of the U. P. Z. A and L. R. Act for declaration of Bhumidhari rights over property comprising in Khasra No. 326 admeasuring 5-3-0 situated in village Jagatpur Lala Begum Pargana and Te...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Madan Gopal Mittal vs Managing Committee, D.A.V. ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
08 December, 2003·4. Thus, the short controversy involved in this case is whether the petitioner Sri Madan Gopal Mittal or the respondent No. 3 Dr. M. S. Kasna is entitled to function as Principal of D.A.V. College, Muzaffarnagar. 5. Regular selection to the post of Principal of a degree College is done by the U. P. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunil Kumar Mishra vs Regional Selection Committee And ...
Judges: R Agrawal
08 December, 2003·(3) Ajit Singh (II) v. State of Punjab and Ors., 2000 (1) AWC 574 (SC) : (1999) 7 SCC 209. 11. He further submitted that the provisions of Article 16(4A) of the Constitution of India is only an enabling provision which has to be backed by a legislation and as in the present case the Reservation Act,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Devi Deen Verma vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, K Rakhra
08 December, 2003·2. The appellant's application for restoration has been dismissed vide the impugned order dated 21.5.2003. The appellant has challenged the order of compulsory retirement which petition has been dismissed in default on 15.11.1995. The restoration was moved after a considerable delay and it appears t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aryan Institute Of Management And ... vs Vice Chancellor, Dr. B.R. ...
Judges: V Sahai
08 December, 2003·4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the institute tried to admit the students from the list sent by the University, but since no one was coming forward the list was again called from the University. So far as normal seats are concerned the University did not send the third list insp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kiran Traders vs Judge Small Cause Court And Ors.
Judges: S Mehrotra
08 December, 2003·3. From a perusal of the averments made in the Writ Petition and the Annexures thereto, it appears that the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 herein filed a Release Application under Section 21 (1) (a) of the U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 (in short "the Act") against the petitioner herein and others for the re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.