Sushila Tyagi (Dr.) vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: B Chauhan, G Dass
18 April, 2003·7. In the instant case in absence of any statutory provision or amendment thereof providing for 62 years of age of superannuation Shri Khare could not point out any provision which creates a legal right in favour of the petitioner and for which writ petition has been filed Permitting the petitioner ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Prakash Singh vs Member Secretary, Cadre ...
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
18 April, 2003·3. The petitioner is senior Manager in Badaun Co-operative Bank Limited, Badaun. It is alleged in paragraph 3 of the writ petition that the petitioner along with two other officers i.e. Rameshwar Prasad and P. C. Misra by an order dated May 21, 1997 issued by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Socie...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Saxena vs Chairman, Lic And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
18 April, 2003·3. It is alleged in paragraph 7 of the petition that the Divisional Office of LIC at Kanpur fixed the date, time and place for the test of the candidates selected by the Divisional Office, LIC, Kanpur on November 1, 1993, and the test was to be held at Lucknow. It is alleged that the petitioner was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sangam Lal Singh (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: M Jain, K Ojha
18 April, 2003·2. Firearm wound on entry in 1/4" diameter with fresh bleeding on left side of abdomen. Blackening was present and there was no tattooing. 3. Two firearm found of entry in 1/4" diameter with lacerated margins. Blackening was present and there was scorching. Fresh bleeding was present. 4. Two firearm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abhishek Srivastava And Ors. vs Banaras Hindu University And Ors.
Judges: A Bhushan
18 April, 2003·"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to hear the applicants as interveners and the petition be disposed of finally in terms of the Regulations promulgated by the Medical Council of India and the rules framed by the respondent-university in consonance the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
K.N. Dwivedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
18 April, 2003·4. In paragraph 8 of the writ petition it is alleged that the petitioner was initially appointed as Deputy Director in the society and subsequently he was promoted as Director on 6.6.2000 vide Annexure-1 to the writ petition. It is alleged in paragraph 9 of the writ petition that he was appointed as...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Somani Iron And Steels Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
18 April, 2003·3. The appellant is a limited liability company carrying on the business of manufacturing and sale of steel and ingots. In the process of manufacturing the petitioner makes purchases of iron scrap. It is alleged in the statement of facts in the memorandum of appeal that the accounts of the assessee ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Calcutta Silicate And Chemical ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
18 April, 2003·4. The petitioner is a partnership firm which established a new industrial unit for the manufacture of sodium silicate at its factory situate at Hapur Road, Meerut. The petitioner applied for registration with the Director of Industries as a small-scale industries and it was granted registration cer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Ranjana Tiwari vs Director Of Higher Education And ...
Judges: B Chauhan, G Dass
18 April, 2003·(3) The Director shall having due regard in the prescribed manner, to the order of preference if any indicated by the candidates under the second proviso to Sub-section (4) of Section 12, intimate to the management the name of a candidate from the list referred to in Sub-section (1) for being appoin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
N.K. Agrawal And Ors. vs Kashi Gramin Bank And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, P Krishna
18 April, 2003·7. In paragraph 16 of the petition it is alleged that the impugned order/select list dated 22.6.2001 by which respondent Nos. 2 to 18 have been promoted is liable to be set aside, firstly on the ground that the guideline adopted by the selection committee were not informed to the Board of Directors ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.