Payal Enterprises vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: U Tripathi
22 November, 2002·(ii) for an interim measure of protection in respect of any of* the following matters, namely : (a) the preservation, interim custody or sale of any goods which are the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement; (b) securing the amount in dispute in the arbitration ; (c) the detention, preservatio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Bahal Nishad vs Director, Fisheries Department ...
Judges: S Ambwani
22 November, 2002·3. I have heard Sri A.P.N. Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for respondents. 4. In the counter-affidavit of Dr. H.N. Singh, Deputy Director, Fisheries, Basti, the receipt of application dated 20.9.2000 and 22.9.2000 have been denied. It is, however, admitted that...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ... vs C.L. Gupta And Sons
Judges: S Sen, S R Alam
21 November, 2002·5. Shri A. N. Mahajan, learned standing counsel for the Income-tax Department (appellant), urged that the sum of customs duty paid by the assessee in March, 1987, is deductible only in the year in which it is actually paid, i.e., the assessment year 1987-88, and not in the assessment year 1988-89, a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vajara Yojna Seed Farm And Ors. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: S Sen, A Bhushan
21 November, 2002·15. The law in force immediately before the appointed day relating to appeals of His Majesty in Council or to the Federal Court from the High Court in Allahabad and the Judges and Division Courts thereof shall, with the necessary modifications apply in relation to the new High Court. ..................
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Pramod Kumar Srivastava And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava, M Singh
21 November, 2002·3. In this connection, suffice it to say that there is nothing to indicate that the insurer appellant had obtained the requisite permission envisaged under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act and in that view of the matter, it can only raise the statutory defences available to it under the provisi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Pramod Kumar Srivastava And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava, M Singh
21 November, 2002·3. In this connection, suffice it to say that there is nothing to indicate that the insurer appellant had obtained the requisite permission envisaged under Section 170 of the Motor Vehicles Act and in that view of the matter, it can only raise the statutory defences available to it under the provisi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Director, Mandi Parishad And Ors. vs Sohan Lal And Anr.
Judges: S Sen, S R Alam
21 November, 2002·4. Shri B.D. Madhyan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant vehemently argued that the appointments in Mandi Samiti are governed by the statutory regulation. It is submitted that the regulation does not envisage appointment on compassionate ground, on account of acquisition of land an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Syed Takhleekh Haider Zaidi And ... vs Nasiruddin And Ors.
Judges: S Sen, S R Alam
21 November, 2002· (d) .................................. (e) .................................. (f) .................................. (g) .................................. (h) .................................. (i) .................................. (j) .................................. (k) ..................
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mumtaz Ahmad And Etc. vs Pakeeza Chemicals And Ors.
Judges: U Tripathi
21 November, 2002·11. Section 23 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 reads as under :-- 23. Registration :-- (1) Subject to the provisions of Section 19, when an application for registration of a trade mark in Part A or Part B of the register has been accepted and either- (a) the application has not been opposed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vani Pati Tripathi vs Director General, Medical ...
Judges: S Sen, A Bhushan
21 November, 2002·9. The aforesaid case does not help the appellant in any manner. The aforesaid case arose under Consumer Protection Act 1986 in which question raised before the Apex Court was that in view of the dismissal of the first complaint filed by the respondent the second complaint on the same facts and caus...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.