Umadatt vs Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: S Srivastava
03 May, 2002·"Para 3.--That aggrieved against the judgment of the Forest Settlement Officer, the opposite party preferred an appeal within the Forest Act and appeal was heard ex parte without any notice to the petitioner. In the appeal, the appellate court has revised the Judgments of the Forest Settlement Offic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Murari And Ors. vs Iiird Additional District And ...
Judges: A Kumar
02 May, 2002·5. The contention of Shri Rajesh Tandon, learned Senior advocate appearing for the petitioners, is that by passing the order, Hon'ble Supreme Court has directed to consider the subsequent events ; that is why the review application has been filed. The subsequent event relied upon by the petitioners ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Satyawati And Ors. vs Prescribed Authority, Etawah And ...
Judges: A Kumar
01 May, 2002·1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned standing counsel representing the State-respondents. 2. This is a writ petition filed by petitioners-tenant against whom the prescribed authority has passed the order dated 8.12.2000 directing to proceed with the case ex...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Aparna Ghosh vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, R Tiwari
01 May, 2002·2. The petitioner is a bonded lady doctor appointed under a scheme of the U. P. Government. She has filed this writ petition seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to give the benefit of continuity of her service for the period 12.8.1973 to 26.1.1975 and to grant her...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. And Anr. vs Additional District Judge ...
Judges: A Kumar
01 May, 2002·1. Heard Sri R. K. Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri Pradeep Saxena, learned counsel for the contesting respondent. 2. The facts leading to the filing of present writ petition are that the landlord filed an application under Section 21 (8) of U.P. Act N...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satyendra Nath Srivastava vs Ist Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: A Kumar
01 May, 2002·JUDGMENT Anjani Kumar, J. 1. This writ petition by the petitioner claiming that the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are the tenant filed an application under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 for the release of the accommodation which according to the respondents is only a tin-shed erected by them...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.