Cit vs Ganga Cold Storage
Judges:
09 July, 2002·"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that in working out the income, the assessee registered firm, was entitled to set off of unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier years brought forward against the income liable to assessment for the ass...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kr. Om Autar vs District Commandant Home Guard ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
08 July, 2002·5. After remand, the respondent No. 3 by its order dated 27.2.1985 partly allowed the application under Section 21 (8,) of the U. P. Act XIII of 1972 and enhanced the monthly rent of the said premises in question to Rs. 700. 6. Against the said order dated 27.2.1985, the petitioner filed an appeal b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh Shukla vs District ...
Judges: M Katju, D Chaudhary
08 July, 2002·1. The petitioner took a theka. In respect of which the impugned recovery has been issued. The petitioner has not disputed that he has operated the theka but he is not paying the theka money. He is challenging the recovery certificate on the ground that the recovery could not be made as arrears of l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Narain Gupta vs Gur Bachan Singh Saluja And Ors.
Judges: U Dhaon
08 July, 2002·(i) Whether the tenancy is covered by the provisions of the U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972? (ii) Whether the tenant did not pay the rent as averred by the plaintiff and what was the rate of rent originally agreed upon? (iii) If so, what relief the plaintiff is entitled to? 3. Both the parties in support o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Rice And Dal Mill And Anr. vs Food Commissioner/Food ...
Judges: S Srivastava, K Sinha
05 July, 2002·2. Perused the record. 3. Taking into consideration the nature of the controversy raised In this case, the learned standing counsel states that no counter-affidavit is proposed to be filed. 4. The only submission urged and pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in support of the writ peti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
S.B. Bhardwaj (D) Through L.Rs. vs Xivth Additional District Judge ...
Judges: A Kumar
05 July, 2002·4. The Prescribed Authority has recorded a finding that the building in question, i.e., 112/329, Saraswati Sadan. Swaroop Nagar. Kanpur in which four tenants are residing there is some other accommodation which is in possession of the landlord. It is also stated by the Prescribed Authority that all ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhey Shyam vs Xth Additional District And ...
Judges: A Kumar
05 July, 2002·2. Aggrieved thereby, the landlord filed a revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887. The revisional court on the basis of findings recorded by the trial court found that findings recorded by the trial court deserve to be reversed and recorded its own findings that the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Jaman Khan vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
05 July, 2002·3. The present application under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Act out of which this writ petition arises, was filed in the year 1990, which was registered as Case No. 41 of 1990, on the ground that the landlord wants to set up his younger son who was 15 years of age at the time when the earlier applica...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravindra Nath Upadhyay vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, R Tiwari
05 July, 2002·5. It has also been submitted by the respondents that the petitioner, had filed an earlier writ petition challenging the same order, which was dismissed and hence this second writ petition is not maintainable. It is further submitted that the present case !s a clear case of fraud and interpolation i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sundari Devi And Ors. vs Viith Additional District Judge ...
Judges: A Kumar
05 July, 2002·1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners are challenging the order dated 4.8.1990, Annexure-6 to the writ petition, passed by respondent No. 1 in Appeal No. 74 of 1985. whereby appeal filed by the landlord has been allowed and the order dat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.