Narendra Kumar Jain vs Sunil Kumar Chaurasia
Judges: B Rathi
05 December, 2002·5. I have heard Sri Vimlesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri A. K. Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party. 6. The first argument of the learned counsel for the revisionist is that there was no fair trial of the case and no opportunity to produce evidence was given to th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ravendra Singh vs Shrichand And Ors.
Judges: B Rathi
05 December, 2002·3. The first argument of the learned counsel for the respondents is that the appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law, "whether the plaintiffs were ready and willing to perform their part of the contract". Shri R. P. Goel, learned Sr. Advocate has argued that this is not a substantial ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sushil Kumar Dwivedi vs Basic Shiksha Adhikari And Ors.
Judges: J Sahai
05 December, 2002·5. We may now direct attention to the central issue involved in the case, i.e.. whether the appointment of the petitioner was void or merely irregular. Before adverting to the cases cited by the parties upon the point, it is necessary to refer to some of the provisions of the U. P. Recognized Basic ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs Kaptan Singh And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava, M Singh
05 December, 2002·1. The appellant feels aggrieved by the award of an amount of Rs. 2,02,400/ - as compensation to the claimant on account of simple and grievous injuries sustained by him causing permanent disability upto the limits of 50% in the accident involving the offending motor vehicle, Bus No. U.P. 75A/3515 o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mishri Singh vs Iiird Additional District Judge ...
Judges: R Tiwari
05 December, 2002·"(1) Whether there is any passage of Haveli of plaintiff towards north as alleged in the plaint? (2) Whether the rainy water and water of daily use of the plaintiff's Haveli passes towards north as alleged in the plaint? (3) To what relief, if any, is the plaintiff entitled?" 4. In the meantime an a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bangali Babu Misra vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Kant, K Kishore
05 December, 2002·5. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having been allowed to work and having been paid salary, is not being paid his post-retiral dues and pensionary benefits, therefore, for the payment of the same, the present petition has been filed. 6. Withholding of the post-retiral ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Sales Tax vs Prakash Chandra Narendra Kumar
Judges: R Agrawal
05 December, 2002·2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present revision are as follows : The assessee-opposite party is a registered dealer under the provisions of the U.P. Sales Tax Act and is engaged in the business of sale of jewellery and silver ornaments. For the assessment year 1982-83 the assessee-op...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Anand Kumar Gupta vs Rajghat Education Centre And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, Y Singh
05 December, 2002·2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 29.4.2002, Annexure-13 to the writ petition. In our opinion, this writ petition is not maintainable, as it has been filed against a private body, namely, Rajghat Education Centre, Varanasi. 3. Ordinarily, no writ lies against a private body e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. And Anr. vs Presiding Officer, Industrial ...
Judges: R Tiwari
05 December, 2002·(3) Sri Surendra Singh Tyagi, son of Kamal Singh. 4. Before the Tribunal, the petitioners employers Tubewell Construction Sub-Division, Etah and Tubewell Construction Division Agra did not put in appearance through their representatives. The case of the workmen, represented by Sri B. L. Prasad befor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Braj Bhushan Tiwari vs District Inspector Of Schools And ...
Judges: J Sahai
05 December, 2002·4. The question Involved in this case has been considered in Samar Bahadur Singh v. Deputy Director of Education and Ors., 1991 (1) AWC 355 : (1991) 1 UPLBEC 653. It was held there that M.Ed. is a Post-Graduate Degree. Paragraphs 17 and 18 of that decision are being quoted. "17. The contention of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.