Amit Kumar Pandey vs Registrar, Deen Dayal Upadhyay ...
Judges: R Yadav
16 April, 2002·2. Perused the averments made in the writ petition as well as in the counter affidavit filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2. It is averred by the contesting respondents No. 1 and 2 in paragraph 4 of their counter affidavit that while the petitioner was appearing in LLB Part III Examination on 12th Decem...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cawnpore Metal Stores And Anr. vs Additional District ...
Judges: B Rathi
16 April, 2002·4. In this case, It is undisputed that the disputed shop and another shop were allotted to late Ravinder Nath Gupta, father of the petitioner No. 2 by the District Magistrate/Rent Control Officer, Kanpur Nagar on 12.11.1964 and he was tenant of both the shops and was paying rent. Sri Ravindra Nath G...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammed Salim Khan vs District Inspector Of Schools, ...
Judges: R Yadav
16 April, 2002·3. Without delineating the facts averred in the writ petition and controverted in separate counter-affidavits filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and respondent No. 3 in detail, it is borne out from perusal of record that the term of office of the elected Committee of Management has already expired und...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subhash Krishna Saxena vs Special Judge (E.C. Act) And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
15 April, 2002·(i) that the building require demolition ; (ii) that a proper estimate of expenditure over the proposed demolition and new construction has been prepared ; (iii) that a plan has been duly prepared and conforms to the bye-laws or regulations of the local authority or other statutory authority under a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankar Lal Yadav vs District Judge, Mirzapur And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
15 April, 2002·1. Heard Sri L.N. Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned standing counsel as well as Sri Wasim Alam, learned counsel in opposition. 2. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the order of the r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satish Chandra Goel vs Chief Development Officer, ...
Judges: M Katju, R Tiwari
15 April, 2002·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. 2. The petitioner is challenging that part of the Judgment of the U. P. Public Service Tribunal, dated 24.8.2001, Annexure-13 to the writ petition, by which he has been deprived of interest on his pension. Interest is the norm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Yaqub vs Vice-Chancellor Of Aligarh ...
Judges: R Yadav
15 April, 2002·1. Examinations of the university, other than the Doctorate examination, shall be open to the following categories of candidates : (a) regular students, i.e.. candidates, who have undergone a regular course of study in the University or an institution maintained by the University for a period specif...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shamsher Alam Alias Sheru And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: B K Roy, R Deepak
15 April, 2002·5. Two counter-affidavits have been filed in this writ petition. 5.1 In his counter-affidavit respondent No. 3 asserts, inter alia, that his daughter is an innocent girl, who was kidnapped by the petitioners and their colleagues, who are involved in anti social activities of kidnapping girls and sup...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vindhya Vasini vs Prescribed Authority And Ors.
Judges: R Yadav
15 April, 2002·1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the orders impugned dated 22.5.2000 (Annexure-14) and 23.3.2002 (Annexure-15) to the writ petition. 2. It is settled principle of law that a writ of certiorari is maintainable against final order after exhausting all the statutory remedy. Here, in ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sushil Kumar Srivastava And Anr. vs U.P. Public Service Commission
Judges: A Bhushan
12 April, 2002·5. A counter-affidavit and a supplementary counter-affidavit has been filed by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission. In the counter-affidavit, it has been stated that both the petitioners could not secure minimum qualifying marks of 40% in the written test, hence they have rightly not been ca...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.