Peer Gulam vs Iiird Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: Y Singh
19 November, 1999·(iii) Has the contesting respondent made out the grounds for eviction of the petitioner under Section 21 (1) (a) of the new Act? 1st Point : Possession of tenant after termination of tenancy-Permissive 4. Section 116 of the Evidence Act enacts a rule of estoppel between a landlord and a tenant. The ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Heera Mani Tiwari And Ors. vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Trivedi, M Jain
19 November, 1999·6. Death had occurred due to shock and haemorrhage as a result of ante-mortem injuries. 7. P.W. 5 Dr. A. D. Singh had conducted post-mortem over the dead body of Hira Mani Singh on 24-11-1981 at 1.40 p.m. The following ante-mortem injuries were found on his person : 1. Firearm wound of entry 2 cm. x...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India And Another vs Vth Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: Y Singh
19 November, 1999·FACTS 2. The respondent Nos. 3 to 6 are the landlords of the premises in dispute. They filed an application for eviction of the petitioner under Section 21(1) (a) of the Act. This application was allowed by the Prescribed Authority on 13.1.1997 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) holding that the need...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankar Singh Yadav vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another
Judges: A Gill, B Singh
18 November, 1999·3. Petitioner Shankar Singh Yadav was a practising lawyer at Jhansi and keeping in view his performance as a legal practitioner, he was appointed as District Government Counsel (Criminal), hereinafter referred to as the D.G.C, (Criminal), initially for a period of one year with effect from August 16...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Jai Durga Construction Co.
Judges: M Agarwal, S R Alam
18 November, 1999·"(i) Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the Departmental appeal and holding that audit report was obtained before the specified date in view of the fact that it was prepared on the last date of the specified date, i.e., on October 31, 1991, and without confirming/verifying when it was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naseem Alias Bhatey vs State
Judges: J Gupta, S Jain
18 November, 1999·2 . A horizontal incised wound, with clean cut margin, on the right waist line 2.75 cm x 0.75 cm x muscle deep, 2 cm lateral to the midline, of the back and 1.5 cm below the upper border of the right pelvic bone. 3. One cut open and stitched surgical wound 1 cm long cm the right lower leg. 4. One cu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Daya Shankar Tiwari vs Chief Of The Army Staff, New Delhi ...
Judges: G Mathur, B Din
18 November, 1999·(a) in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 14th August. 1995 discharging him in the afternoon of 31st July, 1996. (b) in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to discharge him and not to give effect of the order dated 14.8.1995, prior to a decision on the statutory comp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sharda Prasad Mishra vs Assistant General Manager, Ubi ...
Judges: B K Roy, L Bihari
17 November, 1999·1. Failure to discharge his duties with utmost devotion and diligence. Looking to the nature and gravity of the misconduct/ allegations levelled and proved against. Shri S. P. Mishra as also huge outstanding in the relevant accounts, 1 am of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met by imposi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunil Kumar Sharma And Another vs Chairman, Muzaffar Nagar ...
Judges: B Dikshit, A Chakrabarti
17 November, 1999·3. Respondents filed counter-affidavit, supplementary counter-affidavit and rejoinder-affidavits was also filed. 4. Mr. A. K. Srlvastava, learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the authorities have fixed seniority putting the petitioners below the private respondents on a wrong interpret...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bareilly Flour Mills (P.) Ltd. And ... vs U.P. State Electricity Board, ...
Judges: G Mathur, B Din
16 November, 1999·2. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to assess or realise any amount from the petitioner in pursuance of the assessment order dated 1.9.1999 which in turn is based on the alleged ex parts checking report dated 23.8.1999 : or in alternative 3. i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.