Smt. Sunita Singh And Others vs Secretary, Board Of High School ...
Judges: I Quddusi
26 February, 1999·10. It is worthless to say that the authorities of the State should function within the Constitutional framework and it is duty of the State and its authorities to obey the constitutional mandate enshrined under Article of the Constitution. Moreover, the intention of the Legislature in making U. P. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. Through Labour ... vs Om Prakash Sharma And Others
Judges: V Sahai
26 February, 1999·3. The appellate court dismissed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act disbelieving the stand of the petitioner that the Assistant District Government Counsel (Civil) did not inform the department of the date when the judgment was passed and each day's delay had not been properly exp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahboob vs Superintendent, District Jail ...
Judges: R Trivedi, L Bihari
26 February, 1999·7. Counter affidavit, in this petition, has been filed by Shri S. K. Bhatia, Dy. Jailor, District Jail, Meerut on behalf of respondent No. 1 Kuldeep Seth, District Magistrate, Baghpat has filed counter affidavit as respondent No. 2 Shri R. S. Agarwal, Joint Secretary, Government of U.P. (Home and Co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandresh Paswan vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: D Sinha, R Trivedi, D Seth
26 February, 1999·The orders under the Act are passed on subjective satisfaction arrived at on the basis of the material produced before the detaining authority. The prime consideration is the maintenance of public order irrespective of the fact whether criminal case has been registered or not. It is not uncommon tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kundan Lal Ratan Lal Jain vs Assessing Officer
Judges: M Agarwal, R Agarwal
26 February, 1999·1. These four writ petitions by the same assessee are directed against the issue of notices under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), for the assessment years 1989-90,1990-91,1991-92 and 1992-93, respectively. The original assessments for all the years wer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopal And Etc. Etc. vs State Of U.P.
Judges: G M Mishra, K Shahi
26 February, 1999·8. Charges were framed by the learned Sessions Judge. The prosecution examined as many as five witnesses. PW-1 Ram Ajore, P. W.-2 Trijugi Narain, PW-4 Ram Chandra. PW-5 Mohan Lal and PW-7 Rakesh Kumar-injured were examined as eye-witnesses and the witnesses of fact. Out of above five witnesses, Trij...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alchochem Organics (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner (A) C. Ex.
Judges: P Jain
26 February, 1999·2. The petitioner availed Modvat credit in view of the provisions contained in the Central Excise Act and the Rules framed thereunder. The said credit was however disallowed by the Assistant Commissioner (Central Excise) after serving notice upon the petitioner and hearing him. An appeal was preferr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Har Pal Singh vs Additional Sessions ...
Judges: O Garg
25 February, 1999·2. So far as the question of findings of fact recorded by the criminal court in proceedings under Section 125. Cr. P.C. is concerned, they are irrelevant for the purpose of the petition under Section 24 of the Act. Whatever has been said in a criminal case about the relationship of the petitioner an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jitendra (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: K Shahi
24 February, 1999·1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The rape is a very serious crime. It not only demolishes the moral and physical structure of the prosecutrix but also demolishes the very existence of virginity of a lady; but false implication is rather more dangerous than it. In this case when the F.I.R...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Hari Prasad Adhikari vs Chancellor, Sampuranand ...
Judges: M Katju, K Kishore
24 February, 1999·3. The petitioner is a citizen of Bhutan. A vacancy on the post of lecturer in Tulnatmaka Dharma Darshan arose and was advertised vide Annexure-1 to the petition and the petitioner applied against the same. The petitioner was selected on 27.10.1991 and joined on 2.11.1991. 4. Learned counsel for the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.