Bhola vs Deputy Director Of ...
Judges: S P Srivastava
11 November, 1998·3. Order-sheet dated 8.2.1997 is clear to this effect that the matter was treated to be old one and it was ordered to be taken up for hearing even in 1997, therefore, the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner for -time to file rejoinder-affidavit cannot be allowed. Learned counsel for th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Crystal And Chemical ... vs Commissioner, Trade Tax
Judges: S Raza
10 November, 1998·3. The learned Standing Counsel submitted that under Section 12-B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act the Tribunal has been vested with the discretion to reject the additional evidence, if sought to be produced by the assessee, if it could be produced earlier. The revisionist-applicant failed to produce the f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. vs Presiding Offier, Labour Court, ...
Judges: A Chakrabarti
10 November, 1998·4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contended that in view of the charges levelled, the question of loss of confidence of the employer was there and an additional Issue No. 4 was therefore, raised. But the Labour Court did not decide the said charge and reinstatement had been granted witho...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Kumar Gupta vs Shia Central Board Of Waqfs, U.P ...
Judges: M Katju, S Saraf
10 November, 1998· 1. Heard Sri Dhruva Narayana for petitioner and learned standing counsel and Shri Haider Husain for respondents. 2. In our opinion, the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the Tribunal constituted under Section 83 of the Wakf Act, 1995. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner states that the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ellora Paper Mills Ltd. And ... vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges: M Katju, S Saraf
10 November, 1998·302. Power of Parliament to impose restrictions on trade, commerce and intercourse.---Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public interest. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Chameli Devi And Others vs Vith Addl. District Judge, Agra ...
Judges: J Gupta
09 November, 1998·4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents argued that when the substitution application of the petitioners had been rejected by the R.C. and E.O. the review application became infructuous and would be deemed to have been dismissed and when that order was not challenged in revision fr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jag Mohan Singh And Another vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: M Katju, S Saraf
07 November, 1998·1. Heard Sri Devendra Pratap Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. The petitioner has prayed that the Bandh in U. P. whose call has been given by some political parties for 9.11.1998 be declared illegal. 2. The Supreme Court in Communist Party of India v. Bharat Kuma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gokul (Decd.) Through L.R. vs Board Of Revenue, Allahabad And ...
Judges: S Narain
07 November, 1998·5. The trial court after considering the evidence on the record came to the conclusion that Smt. Rani Dulaiya had admitted the petitioner as co-tenant and he remained in possession over the land in dispute as co-tenure holder after the registered Iqrarnama dated 7.7.1947 was executed by Smt. Rani Du...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tarik Mashkur vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: D Mohapatra, R Trivedi
07 November, 1998·9. In this petition counter-affidavit has been filed by Shri Rafiq Ahmad Khan, Under Secretary in the Home and Confidential Department, U. P. Civil Secretariat, on behalf of respondent No. 1. Shri Sanjay Bhatia, the then District Magistrate, Badaun, respondent No. 2, has filed his own counter-affida...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish Tripathi vs U. P. Secondary Education ...
Judges: D Seth
07 November, 1998·3. Mr. R. S. Mishra, learned counsel for respondent No. 5. on the other hand, contends that Rule 9 of 1983 Rules prescribes that the question is to be decided on the date of occurrence of the vacancy. Appearance in examination does not determine the qualification. Unless a person is declared success...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.