Basti Sugar Mill Company Ltd. vs Acce And Ors.
Judges: S Saraf
12 August, 1998·2. The petitioner vide letter dated 10.10.1992 applied to the Excise Authorities to allow clearance of burnt molasses without payment of any duty. Out of total 1486.302 M.T. of molasses, according to the petitioner, only 676.315 M.T. of Black Mass remained which was cleared from the factory and inad...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Murad Begum vs District Supply Officer, ...
Judges: B Roy, R Mahajan
12 August, 1998·2. Sri Y. S. Saxena. learned counsel appearing in support of petition, contended that the view taken by the Additional Collector (Supply) is thoroughly misconceived and contrary to the orders passed by this Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 23454 of 1997. He also placed strong reliance on a let...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Basti Sugar Mill Co. Ltd. vs Acce
Judges: S Saraf
12 August, 1998·2. The petitioner vide letter dated 10.10.1992 applied to the Excise Authorities to allow clearance of burnt molasses without payment of any duty. Out of total 1486.302 M.T. of molasses, according to the petitioner, only 676.315 M.T. of Black Mass remained which was cleared from the factory and inad...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
G.K. Maini vs Xth Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: J Gupta
12 August, 1998·Tenancy - power of Appellate Authority - Sections 22 and 2 (1) (a) of U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - landlord moved application under Section 21 (1) (a) before Prescribed Authority - petitioner contested the application on the ground that landlord has no...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raymond Synthetics Ltd. vs Cegat And Ors.
Judges: S Saraf
12 August, 1998·1. It is recorded that the respondents, in spite of several orders passed by this Court, have failed to produce necessary and the relevant documents that were required for final adjudication of the matter by this Court. However, without going into the merits of this case, I direct the Tribunal to de...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Joint Director, Bhartiya ... vs Jan Mohammad And Others
Judges: D Mohapatra, R Trivedi
11 August, 1998·2. In this appeal filed under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the High Court Rules, the respondents of Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5100 of 1998 have challenged the judgment/order dated 18.2.1998 in which the learned single Judge disposed of the writ petition with certain directions. The impugned order rea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Meerut Development Authority, ... vs Chaddha Construction Co., New ...
Judges: P Basu, P Jain
11 August, 1998·10. It has been strongly contended by Sri W. H. Khan that sub-section (3) of Section 34 of the satd Act is in negative form and puts a bar at the first instance of 3 months and in the second instance of 30 days and thereafter puts a complete blockade in preferring the objections. There can possibly ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Km. Madhurima Bhargava And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: G Malaviya, K Shahi
11 August, 1998·6. Coming to the actual question of reference, under Section 320 Cr. P.C. offences punishable under Sections specified in the first two columns of the Table may be compounded by the persons mentioned in the third column of that Table. Under Section 320(2) Cr. P.C, the offences mentioned in the first...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kailash Kumar vs Ivth Adl. District Judge, ...
Judges: J Gupta
11 August, 1998·"R. C. R. No. 23 of 1982 is allowed and the order dated 22.7.1982 challenged in revision is set aside. The Rent Control and Eviction Officer will proceed in the matter according to law in the light of the observations made above." 4. It is not disputed that this order of the revisional court was nev...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharmendra Narayan Dwivedi vs Director General, Medical ...
Judges: O Garg
11 August, 1998·6. "Capitation fee' means charging or collecting amount beyond what is permitted by laws ; it is nothing but a price for selling education. The Supreme Court's decision in Miss Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka. (1992) 3 SCJ 152, on the capitation fee is a landmark in the history of education in ind...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.