Km. Rajni Mishra And Another vs Special Judge (E.C. Act), Agra And ...
Judges:
09 April, 1998·3. It is not disputed that the petitioners came to occupy the building in question in the year 1986 without any order of allotment. The only question which arose for determination before the Courts below was whether the building at the time of letting was governed by the provisions of U. P. Act No. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Keshav Lal Khatri And Others vs Mukhya Nagar Adhikari, Nagar Maha ...
Judges:
09 April, 1998·3. After having heard the learned counsels for both the parties at length, it appears from the said order that the objection filed by the objector was held to be ineffective, therefore, the said order was not an ex parte order. However, the name of the objector does not find place in the said order ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Mukti Ray And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges:
09 April, 1998·2. By an interim order dated 3.1.1992 passed in this writ petition, the said recovery has been stayed and it was directed that the house rent allowance should be paid to the petitioners. 3. The said Government Orders have been challenged on the ground that it is discriminatory inasmuch as while hous...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Lal (Decd.) Through Lrs. vs Raghuvir Prasad And Others
Judges: R Ray
09 April, 1998·1. In this appeal, it has been contended that the judgment passed by the learned District Judge, Jhansi, was wrong and perverse and it should be set aside and the order of the trial court be restored. It has been contended that the appellant has filed an application under Order XXI. Rule 16. C.P.C. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Good Cause Association, ... vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: M Katju, S Saraf
07 April, 1998·1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. This petition has been filed against the Anti-copying Ordinance recently promulgated by the U. P. Government on 18.3.1998. true copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition. We find no merit in this petition. It is well-known that f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yamuna Narain Misra vs District Inspector Of Schools And ...
Judges: J Gupta
07 April, 1998·4. The Committee of Management, respondent No. 3 in their counter affidavit have not disputed most of the facts as stated by the petitioner in the writ petition. It is however stated by them in the counter affidavit that both the petitioner and respondent No. 4 joined the institution on the same dat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Zila Sahkari Federation Ltd. vs Deputy Labour Commissioner And ...
Judges: D Seth
07 April, 1998·"Heard counsel for the parties and perused the award. Upon consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is hereby provided that the operation of the impugned awards dated 3.7.95 and 4.7.95 shall remain stayed only in so far as it directs payment of back wages, provided the respondent...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh Kumar vs Vith Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: J Gupta
07 April, 1998·5. Despite time having been allowed, no counter-affidavit has been filed by respondent Nos. 3 and 4 though they are represented by Sri P. K. Srivastava. 6. When this writ petition came up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and only learned counsel for the petitioner has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Das Gupta vs Naeem Ullah And Others
Judges:
07 April, 1998·7. Before coming to the real controversy between the parties, it would be necessary to have a look to the provisions of Section 21 (1A) of the Act which are reproduced as under : "Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 2, the prescribed authority shall, on the application of a landlord in tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ultimate Advertising And ... vs G.B. Laboratories Ltd., Kanpur
Judges: D Mohapatra, S Narain
07 April, 1998·6. The appellant had filed a company petition for winding up the company under Section 433(e) read with Section 434(a) of the Act. Section 433 of the Act enumerates the circumstances under which the Court may pass an order for winding up the company. Clause (e) provides that if a company is unable t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.