Ghaziabad Development Authority vs M/S. Unique Construction, ...
Judges: O Prakash, B Sharma
31 January, 1997·(Underlining by Court) 3. The question is what is the true interpretation of the delineated portion in the arbitration clause. 4. Sri Ashok Khare, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the words "the parties can agree" occurring in the arbitration clause clearly indicate that the parties c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. P.P. Rastogi And Ors. vs Meerut University And Anr.
Judges: M Katju, B Chauhan
31 January, 1997·1. This is an application to review the jugment dated 27-11-1995 passed by the Bench of Hon'ble Paritosh K. Mukherji J. and Hon'ble Jagdish Bhalla, JJ. Since Hon'ble Paritosh K. Mukherji, J. has retired and Hon'ble Jagdish Bhalla, JJ. is sitting in Lucknow Bench of this Court, Hon'ble the Chief Just...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Hindustan Computers Ltd.
Judges: R Dayal, R Gulati
30 January, 1997·1. Heard Sri Shekhar Srivastava, advocate, standing counsel for the Revenue, and Sri Sudhir Chandra, senior advocate, assisted by Sri S. Chopra and Sri Tapas Mishra, advocates, for the assessee. 2. This is an application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for reference of the followin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Industrial Cables (India) Ltd. vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: B Kumar, M Sharan
29 January, 1997·2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner manufactures steel wires which are used as raw material by other manufacturers of certain notified items. The petitioner sells the manufactured steel wires to other dealers. In the present case certain sales were made to purchasers who held eligibility c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deepak Ganguly vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: D Seth
29 January, 1997·9. The very description of the Institute as an organisation in the Ministry of Science and Technology Government of India indicates the same to be a Part of the Government though secluded out as a society for the purposes of administrative efficiency. The objects enumerated are also very much necess...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Kishore Kela vs Union Bank Of India
Judges: O Prakash, B Sharma
28 January, 1997·1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The admitted facts are that the appellant had taken a loan from the respondent-bank, Union Bank of India. When the appellant failed to repay the loan, respondent No. 1 issued a recovery certificate to the Revenue authorities to recover the amount as arrears ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baghel Construction vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: R Dayal, R Gulati
28 January, 1997·1. Heard Sri V.K. Rastogi, advocate, for the petitioner, and Sri Bharat Ji Agarwal, senior standing counsel, for the respondents on admission. 2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the vires of Section 44AD of the Income-tax Act and Circular No. 737 dated February 23, 1996, issued by the Ce...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Kumar Mahendra vs Registrar, Hon'Ble High Court Of ...
Judges: B Lal, Bhagwandin
27 January, 1997·5. Before entering into merits of the appeal it is necessary to discuss the scope of the appeal under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of the Rules of the Court. 6. It appears, after abolition of Clause 10 of Letters Patent, Rule 5 was incorporated under Chapter VIII of the Rules of the Court by Notification No...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umendra Pratap Singh vs U.P. Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
Judges: D Seth
27 January, 1997·1. The Petitioner's father died in harness on February 15, 1993. Admittedly the petitioner is a graduate as claimed in paragraph 2 of the writ petition. He was given employment for the post of clerk, a class III post. The petitioner claimed to be promoted to the post of Junior Branch Manager on the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Waheed & Company vs Income Tax Officer.
Judges:
24 January, 1997·2. I have heard Sri Rajiv Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Kumar Agarwal, learned standing counsel for the respondents. 3. The petitioner claims that it is an AOP that carried on business only during the financial year 1983-84 relevant to asst. yr. 1984-85. It filed a return...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.