U.P. Financial Corporation vs Idrish
Judges: O Prakash, B Sharma
28 February, 1997·2. This F. A. F. O. is directed against the impugned award dated November 20, 1996, passed by the trial court restraining respondents Nos. 1 and 2 from realising Rs. 8,31,318 from the plaintiffs. 3. The facts are that the plaintiffs entered into an agreement for taking a term loan with defendant No....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nagrath Paints (P) Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: A Chakrabarti
27 February, 1997·1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Shushil Harksali, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioners contends that the impugned order is bad as it has not been passed taking into consideration profit and loss account of the company and wrongfully showing a profit although p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Jeet Singh Khara vs Indian Overseas Bank
Judges: O Prakash, B Sharma
25 February, 1997·1. Heard counsel for the appellant and Shri Saran, counsel for the respondent. 2. The plaintiff is the Indian Overseas Bank, which filed a suit for recovery of a huge amount against the defendant-appellant. Pending the suit, the plaintiff-bank made an application for an ad interim injunction praying...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mishri Lal Gupta And Co. vs Union Bank Of India
Judges: O Prakash, B Sharma
24 February, 1997·2. By an order dated January 22, 1996, annexure 1 to the supplementary affidavit, the defendant-bank was directed to renew the cash credit limit agreement of the plaintiff for one year more, the plaintiff was directed to render full and regular account of transactions of sale to the defendant-bank a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Bindu Sharma vs Ram Prakash Sharma And Others
Judges: O Prakash, B K Sharma
24 February, 1997·6. The trial court framed an issue; whether the respondent obtained the consent of the petitioner for her marriage with respondent No. 1 by fraud. The petitioner and respondent No. 1 both examined themselves. Considering their evidence, the trial court held as follows :-- ".....It is very well recog...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pranab Baruah vs Banaras Hindu University, ...
Judges: A Chakrabarti
20 February, 1997·3. Approaching the respondents, the petitioner did not get any decision and so this writ petition was filed. Opportunity granted by this Court to the University authorities for a decision by the Admission Committee was not availed of and the matter was postponed recording that since the matter had g...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Shashi Jain vs Income-Tax Officer And Anr.
Judges: R Dayal, R Gulati
18 February, 1997·1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari, quashing the notices dated November 18, 1996, under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1990-91, 1991-92, and also the notices dated September 6, 1996, issued under the same provision for the assessment yea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinaya Chandra Pandey And Anr. vs Chancellor, University Of ...
Judges: D Mohapatra, R Trivedi
18 February, 1997·6. Petitioners challenged the election of respondent No. 5 under Section 68 of the Act by making a reference on 21-3-1994. A supplementary representation was also filed on 31-3-1994. However, the reference was not decided. Then the present petition was filed in this Court on 1-6-1994. As already sta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunil Kumar Singh vs Superintendant Of Police And Ors.
Judges: G Mathur, D Srivastava
18 February, 1997·5. Rejoinder affidavit has been filed and according to annexure-RA-1, the petitioner was discharged in criminal case No. 2693 of 1994 Under Sections 329, 411, 419, 420, 467, 468, 474, I.P.C. 6. In the supplementary affidavit the petitioner has stated that History Sheet is still continuing and the pe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajai Pratap Singh vs Chairman, Oil Selection Board, ...
Judges: D Mohapatra, R Trivedi
18 February, 1997·3. Respondents filed counter affidavit I\refuting the allegations made and it was said that the gross annual income of respondent No. 5 is below Rs. 50,000/-. In fact the gross income of respondent No. 5 for the financial year 1992-93 was Rs. 39615/- which has been accepted finally by the Income Tax...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.