Vimal Chand Agrawal vs Tax Recovery Officer And Ors.
Judges: B Lal, M Agarwal
27 July, 1995·2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the recovery proceedings on the basis of demand notice dated August 7, 1981, and show-cause notice of the same date contained in annexures-13 and 14, respectively, to this petition. 3. It is contended that in pursu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Olympic Petroproducts Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: B Lal, M Agarwal
27 July, 1995·2. In short the case is that the petitioner M/s. Olympic Petroproducts Limited is engaged in the manufacture of Polyester Monofilament Yarn, the same is chargeable under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 3. It is submitted that the Central Excise Department of Meerut visited the premises of the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Mohan Singh And Etc. vs The State
Judges: S Jain, S Saxena
27 July, 1995·Lower lobe perforated at several places, half pint of dark blood found. The stomach contained 16 ozs of undigested food material. Intestines found perforated at places through and through, semi digested food was coming out of the holes. 11. Dr. Tandon recovered 34 pallets which were sealed in a pack...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mrs. R. Mani Goyal vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: K Sharma
27 July, 1995·3. The petitioner has filed a first appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) at Muzaffarnagar, in respect of the assessment year 1992-93, whereby the income-tax liability of Rs. 31,41,142 was determined but before the disposal of the appeal, the assessing authority has initiated recove...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Janta Cold Storage And Allied ...
Judges: B Lal, S Saksena
19 July, 1995·1. Shri Bharati Ji Agarwal is present for the Revenue. None is present for the respondent. 2. This is an application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 3. Having heard Shri Bharati Ji Agarwal and perusing the record, we are of the opinion that the following question of law docs arise ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ejaz Ahmad vs Asstt. Distt. Electiion Officer, ...
Judges: P Basu, S R Alam
19 July, 1995·4. According to the law prevalent in the State of U.P., some districts have been reserved for Scheduled Caste and Backward Class so far as the offices of member as well as Adhyaksh or Up-Adhyaksh of the Zila Panchayat are concerned. It may be mentioned that Zila Panchayat are District Board. Nomencl...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lajpat Rai And Ors. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: B Lal, M Agarwal
17 July, 1995·8. The provisions of search and seizure are contained in Section 132 of the Income-tax Act under which a Deputy Director of Income-tax is, inter alia, authorised to issue an authorisation to conduct a search. In the present case, the warrant of authorisation for the search of the residential premise...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
J.K. Charitable Trust vs Wealth-Tax Officer And Ors.
Judges: B Lal, M Agarwal
17 July, 1995·3. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri V.B. Upadhyaya, and Sri Bharat Ji Agarwal, learned standing counsel for the respondents. 4. The petitioner is a public religious and charitable trust. Its case is that it is exempt from income-tax by virtue of Section 11 of the Income-tax Act,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Rampur Industries Ltd.
Judges: B Lal, S Saxena
17 July, 1995·JUDGMENT 1. Sri Bharatji Agarwal, learned counsel for the Revenue, and Sri Vikram Gulati, learned counsel for the assessee, are heard on the question of admission. 2. This is an application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Sri Bharatji Agarwal at the very outset relying upon Delhi C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopal Chadha vs Cegat
Judges: M Agarwal
14 July, 1995·2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. No one appeared on behalf of the respondents although a counter affidavit had been filed. 3. The petitioner No. 1 Gopal Chadha claims to be a dealer in gold and gold ornaments. Petitioner No. 2 Ram Sumer claims to be an employee of petitioner ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.