Arvind Kumar Verma vs Smt. Suman
Judges: N Asthana
24 February, 1995·2. The Court below believed the version of the Opposite Party and granted the applicant awarding Rs. 500/- per month as maintenance allowances from the date of order. 3. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have perused the record. 4. From the judgment of the Family Court it would be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Diwan vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: G Malaviya, S Jain
22 February, 1995·6. The autopsy surgeon opined that the death was caused due to haemorrhage and shock which resulted from the above mentioned ante mortem injuries. The time that elapsed between the injuries and death was about 1 to 1 1/2 hours. 7. After the close of prosecution case the statement of accused under Se...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Asha Sharma vs Judge And Anr. Family Courts
Judges: S Narain
22 February, 1995·2. Subsequently, the applicant filed an application (17-D), stating that the opposite party No. 2 has not paid the amount as directed by the Court on 9th July, 1993 and he may be directed to pay the said amount. On 22.11.1994 the Court passed an order staying the further proceedings and directing th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjeev Shukla, Kanpur vs Institute Of Chartered ...
Judges: B Dikshit
22 February, 1995·(a) he is declared to have passed in both the groups taken simultaneously, securing at one sitting a minimum of 40 per cent marks in each paper of the group and a minimum of 50 per cent of the total marks of all the papers of each group; or (b) he is declared to have passed in one group at one exami...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Allen Bradely India Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: A Misra, J Sidhu
21 February, 1995·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.S.N. Tripathi appearing for the respondents who has filed his appearance on behalf of the respondents. 2. In view of the fact and circumstances of this case this writ petition is disposed of finally as also agreed by the counsel for the parties ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vishwakarma Corpn. vs Cce
Judges: A Misra, J Sishu
21 February, 1995·4. The applicant seeks reference of the following questions to this Court for adjudication: 1. "Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal was correct to uphold the order of the Additional Collector, Kanpur, which was based on a corrigendum which (corrigendum) has sought to cure the show cause which was without j...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamlesh Nishad vs District Officer/District ...
Judges: O Prakash, B Dikshit
17 February, 1995·7. In paras 27 and 28 of the writ petition, it is clearly pleaded that by inviting applications for the areas exceeding the limit as mentioned in Rule 10, the respondents are acting contrary to the objective, sought to be achieved by the 20th Amendment made in the Rules. It is averred that immediate...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Majhiyari Matsya Palan Evam Nauka ... vs The Commissioner, Allahabad ...
Judges: R Sharma, M Agarwal
16 February, 1995·2. Zila Panchayat and the Government have filed counter affidavits. Petitioner has filed rejoinder affidavit in reply thereto. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 4. From the perusal of the pleadings of the parties, it appears that a complaint wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Muzeeb vs Dy. Director Of Consolidation, ...
Judges: B Dikshit
16 February, 1995·2. The facts necessary for determining present controversy as set-out in writ petition are that the Consolidation Officer Azamgarh passed an order in Case No. 2355 of 31-3-60 to enter the name of petitioner Muzeeb over plot No. 338 (Old No. 466). The amaldaramad was done accordingly in relevant reco...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Associated Switch Gear Pvt. Ltd. vs Cegat
Judges: K Sharma
16 February, 1995·1. This is an application by the petitioner for clarification of the order dated 10-1-1995 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 57 of 1994 as the learned Tribunal has observed that there is a confusion. 2. I have heard Sri A.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.N. Shukla learned Stand...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.