Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Allahabad Saint Paul Society
Judges: B Lal, R Ray
31 August, 1995·2. We were asked to decide the following question as referred to under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), as to : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal legally correct in holding that the income of the assessee c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Sri Baldeo Ji Maharaj.
Judges:
31 August, 1995·The Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question, stated to be of law and to arise out of its order dt. 26th Aug., 1978, passed in ITA Nos. 2625 and 2626 (Alld) of 1977-78 for the asst. yrs. 1975-76 and 1976-77, for the opinion of this Cour : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstanc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Brigadier B.D. Khurana
Judges: B Lal, R Ray
31 August, 1995·2. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has made this reference to this court under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), for deciding the following common questions of law arising out of its order in I. T. A. Nos. 2867 to 2869/(Del) of 1978-79, dated Decemb...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pravin Kumar Gupta vs Vineeta @ Geeta Rani
Judges: N Ganguly
31 August, 1995·2. The impugned order is by the Family Court Judge, rejecting the application for amendment. Initially the suit was filed for restitution of conjugal rights u/ Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. During the pendency of the suit, application was moved by the applicant for amendment in the plaint see...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs K.C. Mittal
Judges: B Lal, M Agarwal
31 August, 1995·(iii) Whether the Tribunal is in law justified in deciding the appeal without going into applicability of Explanation to Section 271(1)(c) to the assessee's case ?" 2. We have heard Sri Shekhar Srivastava, learned counsel for the Revenue, and Sri Sakeel Ahmad, learned counsel for the assessee. 3. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Banarshi Das Kashi Prasad
Judges: B Lal, M Agarwal
31 August, 1995·"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the profits of Rs. 17,228 and Rs. 39,249 realised by the assessee-Hindu undivided family on the sale of jewellery and ornaments were income, liable to income-tax in the assessment years 1968-69 and 1969-70, respectively ?" 2. We have heard...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pravin Kumar Gupta vs Vineeta @ Geeta Rani
Judges: N Ganguly
31 August, 1995·2. The impugned order is by the Family Court Judge, rejecting the application for amendment. Initially the suit was filed for restitution of conjugal rights u/ Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. During the pendency of the suit, application was moved by the applicant for amendment in the plaint see...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Sri Ram Ratan
Judges: B Lal, M Agarwal
31 August, 1995·Rs. Shri Pradeep Kumar 11,075 Shri Anil Kumar 11,082 Shri Jitendra Kumar 10,770 ?" 2. The first question arises out of the Tribunal's order in Income-tax Appeal No. 748 of 1978 and cross-objection No. 31 of 1977-78. This was an appeal by the Revenue and the cross-objection was filed by the assessee,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Dutt Dubey (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: T Garg
29 August, 1995·3. Briefly the facts of the case are as under:- On 3-5-1978 at about 10.00 a.m. Parmai son of Khachere (since deceased) lodged a First Information Report, Ex. Ka 2, at Police Station Konch; that Sheo Dutt accused and Babu, both sons of Mathuri. who live in his mohalla, had dispute over the property ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyam Glass Works And Anr. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: D Sinha, N Asthana
28 August, 1995·3. The principal ground on which the recovery is assailed is that the factory run by the petitioners is a 'seasonal factory' within the meaning of Section 2(12) of the Act and as such the provisions of the Act shall not apply in view of the provisions contained in Sub-section (4) of Section 1 of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.