Ghatampur Sugar Co. Ltd. vs Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal ...
Judges: A Misra, S Alam
28 April, 1995·1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The only relief sought for is for a direction to respondent No. 1 to hear and decide the appeal and the stay application filed by the petitioner and not to proceed with the recovery as a consequence of the order passed which is the subject-matter of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deo Narain Tewari And Others vs Iiird Additional District Judge ...
Judges: P K Mukherjeee
28 April, 1995·4. Sri S.N. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that in compliance of directions contained in the interim order dated September 5, 1985 of this Court, the petitioner had deposited necessary process fee, together with copies of writ petition and stay application, in the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabir @ Lallu vs Kamla Devi And Anr.
Judges: K Singh
28 April, 1995·2. Brief facts of the case are that Smt. Kamla Devi as married to the applicant Mahabir @ Lallu in the year 1971. She gave birth to a child form his union. After the marriage a bad habit of drink had cultivated in the applicant. He often used to beat his wife and treated her with cruelty. She was pu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamlesh Kumar Madhukar And Others vs Regional Inspectress Of Girls ...
Judges: N Ganguly
27 April, 1995·1. The petitioners have approached this Court for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 14-12-1994, Annexure 6 to the writ petition passed by the authorised controller. The authorised controller appears to be entrusted with the duties of conducting election. In the course of conducti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sita Devi And Etc. vs Additional Commissioner, Agra ...
Judges: P K Mukherjee
26 April, 1995·6. The case of Smt. Sita Devi is that she is judicially separated wife of Harendra Pal Singh since 1957. In the year 1970 she along with her son filed original suit No. 72 of 1970 for injunction and partition. The said suit was decreed on the basis of a compromise on May 27, 1970. In the aforesaid s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Girish Dhar Dwivedi vs District Inspector Of Schools, ...
Judges: N Ganguly
26 April, 1995·4. The matter of approval and recognition about the election of the Committee of Management was not decided by the D.I.O.S. on the ground that the writ petitions concerning the petitioner's institution about the managerial dispute were pending in the High Court. It was on 30-11-1993 when all the wri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Olympic Zippers Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: A Misra, S R Alam
25 April, 1995·2. The petitioner seeks release of seized goods which were made on 23rd August, 1994 and 14th September, 1994 provisionally. 3. The petitioner earlier filed a writ petition being Civil Misc. Petition No. 895 of 1994 seeking quashing of this very seizure and also release of seized goods. 4. Normally ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Leather Trends (Pvt.) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: A Misra, S Alam
25 April, 1995·5. Before entering into the merits, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated, as stated earlier, before the Commissioner of Income-tax, that for the last two balance amount of Rs. 13,25,800, the petitioner does not press for deduction under Section 80HHC. This leaves us the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Malti Kaul And Another vs Allahabad Development Authority ...
Judges: R Sharma, N Ganguly
21 April, 1995·Provided that if the owner making the said representation contend that the amenity had been agreed to be provided or the development had been agreed to be carried out by a coloniser or co-opertive housing society through or from whom the land was acquired by them, they shall file with the Authority ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
K.P.L. Packaging Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: O Prakash, B Chauhan
21 April, 1995·1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.S.N. Tripathi for Union of India. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that as a result of the decision given by Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (C.E.G.A.T.), the petitioner has become entitled to refund and for that it applied b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.