Metitec India Limited vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: P Basu
21 November, 1994·5. Apart from some case laws cited by learned counsel for the petitioner, reliance was also placed on the provisions contained in Sections 6-T(2) and 6-S of the Act. On behalf of the respondents it was said that in view of the facts involved in the present case the State had ample material before it...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P.S.T. Corporation Officers ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: S Raza, G Tripathi
19 November, 1994·5. In the case of Federation of All India Customs and Central Excise Stenographers v. Union of India 1988 (57) FLR 258 (SC) Hon'ble Supreme Court indicated:- "Equal pay for equal work is a concomitant of Article 14 but equal pay for unequal work will be a negation of that right. Equal pay must depen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Ram Autar And Ors.
Judges: S Singh
18 November, 1994·4. The proviso (ii) to Sub-section (1), however, carves out an exception that a policy shall not be required to cover liability in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, any person being carried in or upon or entering or mounting or alighting from the vehicle at the time of the occurrence of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs Naresh Pal Singh And Anr.
Judges: S Mohapatra, V Goel
18 November, 1994·2. On 13.12.1985 claimant drove his tractor with trolley to Kisan Sahkari Chini Mill, Sheikhupur, Budaun. Next day in the early morning at about 6 a.m. he was returning from the sugar mill back home. When he reached near Dharam Kanta of village Nabada a bus bearing registration No. UTI2889 of the ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Kumar Sood vs Deputy Commissioner Of ...
Judges: A Misra, J Sidhu
17 November, 1994·4. A preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the Revenue by learned standing counsel relying on Rajata Trust v. Chief CIT [1992] 193 ITR 220 (Kar). It is urged that a person who had entered into agreement for purchase of property is not a person interested. He cannot object to the purchas...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Awadh vs Employees State Insurance ...
Judges: S Singh
16 November, 1994·1. This appeal under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (in short 'the Act') is directed against the order dated September 29, 1984 of the Employees Insurance Court, Kanpur and raises substantial question as to scope and ambit of the appellate power of the Employees Insurance Cour...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Lal vs Income-Tax Officer
Judges: A Misra, J Sidhu
16 November, 1994·2. The petitioner seeks to challenge the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1984-85 to 1988-89 on March 7, 1989. 3. The petitioner's case is that there was no omission or failure on the part of the assessee to disclose truly and fully material facts...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indraj S/O Desraj And Ors. (In ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: G Tripathi
15 November, 1994·31. Both the accused did not take the plea of right of private defence in their statements under Section 313, Cr.P.C. or even during the course of cross examination of the P.Ws. but it appears that even before the learned lower court and in this court as well, plea of right of private defence has be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Balak Ram Ganesh Prasad vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: O Jain
15 November, 1994·3. Under these circumstances, a complaint has been filed by respondent No. 2 against the petitioner in the court of the Special C. J. M., Allahabad. 4. The facts in Case No. 4712 of 1994 are almost similar and need not be mentioned in detail. It is sufficient to say that in this case also some addit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Durga Prasad Singh And Another vs Ram Lakhan And Others
Judges: S Narain
14 November, 1994·3. Learned counsel for the petitioners urged that the judgment-debtor-respondent No. 1 has to comply with two conditions before the auction sale is to be set aside. Firstly, he should have deposited the amount as provided under Order 21, Rule 89, C.P.C. and secondly, he should have filed an applicat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.