Century Foams Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Gulati, S Verma
31 January, 1994·3. Whether, on the facts in the circumstances of the case, the decision of the Tribunal approving the addition for stock discrepancy in the case of CIT v. General Metal Works [1988] 172 ITR 173 (All) ? 4. Whether the finding of the Tribunal that the Uchanti loan of 1,240 kgs. of R. C. Lates is an un...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Birendra Bikram Singh And Others vs Kamala Devi
Judges: S Raza
29 January, 1994·7. After considering the entire evidence on record, the Courts below have given a finding that the marriage between the plaintiff and defendant No. 1 had taken place in the year 1968 and marriage between defendant No. 1 and defendant No. 2 had taken place in the year 1978. This is a concurrent findi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Nand Kishore Gupta, Advocate vs The Hindustan Commercial Bank ...
Judges: D Yadav, G Mathur
28 January, 1994·4. Ex abundanti cautela, the statutory provisions of Rule 4 of the Order 40 is set out: "4. Where a receiver- (a) fails to submit his account at such periods and in such form as the Court directs, or (b) fails to pay the amount due from him as Court directs, or (c) occasion loss to the property by h...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Matador Malik Association vs The Deputy Transport ...
Judges: V Khare, M Katju
27 January, 1994·2. We have heard Shri A.D. Saunders, learned Counsel for the petitioner and we find no merit in this petition. 3. The petitioner is a registered Union under the control and supervision of which the members of the Union operate their vehicles and they have been granted Motor Cab permits by the State ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Atar Singh And Others vs District Judge, Jhansi And Others
Judges: S Narain
27 January, 1994·6. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the decree passed by the Judge, Small Causes Court was a nullity. The court without framing points for determination in the suit, delivered the following judgment-on 9-7-76 which runs as follows: "Case called out. Plaintiff is present. Defendant ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Dasnam Naga Sanyasi And ... vs Allahabad Development ...
Judges: S Mohapatra, V Goel
25 January, 1994·2. A suit for relief of perpetual prohibitory injunction requires disclosure of facts to satisfy the requirements of S. 38 of the Specific Relief Act and absence of prohibition contained in S. 41 thereof. In such a suit court has a discretion which is to be exercised judicially for grant of perpetua...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Het Ram Kanodia vs Xth Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: S Narain
24 January, 1994·The Court cannot pass a decree unless the grounds mentioned under Section 20(2) of the Act exist. 7. In Qudrat Ullah v. Municipal Board, Bareilly. AIR 1974 SC 396, Krishna Iyer J. speaking for the Court, observed (at p. 402 of AIR) :-- "Section 3 is only a procedural restoration and does not create ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indu Bhushan Sah (Huf) vs Wealth-Tax Officer And Anr.
Judges: A Misra, R Gulati
24 January, 1994·1. Since the aforesaid two writ petitions raise a common question, they are being disposed of finally by means of a common judgment after hearing learned counsel for the parties. In these two cases in spite of time being granted in the past to learned counsel for the Revenue no counter-affidavit has...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kumari Misra vs Chander Roshni Dubey And Ors.
Judges: J Semwal
21 January, 1994·5. Section 319 Cr. P.C. reads as follows : - "(1) Where, in the course of any inquiry into, or trial of, an offence, it appears from the evidence that any person not being the accused has committed any offence for which such person could he tried together with the accused, the Court may proceed agai...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ugra Sen Singh vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: V Saran
21 January, 1994·3. It may further be mentioned that by its order dated November 17, 1992 this court had further directed that the representation made by the petitioner (Annexure-3 to the writ petition) be also considered and decided by the opposite party No. 3. It appears that in spite of the communication of this ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.