Rahmat Ullah And Khatoon Nisa vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: H N Tilhari
15 April, 1994·53. The use of expression 'judicially' before separated qualifies the nature and the mode how separated in brought about. When we concentrate on this expression 'judicially' it lead to the necessity of involvement of an act of exercise of jurisdiction and discretion and judgment of judicial forum i....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Lalita Devi vs Smt. Kamla Devi
Judges: A Banerji
13 April, 1994·Khare, learned counsels appearing for the decree holders-respondent. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the revision is being finally decided at the admis sion stage. 5. The main submission of the learned counsel for the revisionist is that as the judgment debtor-revisionist an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India, North Eastern ... vs Om Construction And Supply ...
Judges: A Banerji
13 April, 1994·4. The main submission of Shri Goel, learned counsel for the applicant in Civil Revision No. 206 of 1993 is that the civil court by giving a direction to the arbitrators to make an interim award and that too for a specific sum has acted with manifest illegality and in excess of its jurisdiction. Sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Oil And Natural Gas Commission vs District Collector, Dehradun And ...
Judges: R Sharma, K Narayan
12 April, 1994·1993. Recovery proceedings for recovering a sum of Rs. 9,07,222.14 P. as arrears of land revenue, was accordingly issued against the petitioner. In pursuance of recovery proceedings a citation to appear before the Recovery Officer, was also issued to it. Petitioner has thereafter filed this writ pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umendram Sahu vs Secretary, Examination ...
Judges: S Sodhi, R Sharma
12 April, 1994·2. The charge against the appellant was that he was found in possession, during the examination, of material relevant to the subject of the examination. 3. It was sought to be contended on behalf of the appellant that in terms of Section 13 of the U.P. Pradeshik Shiksha Adhiniyam 1962, the result of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Surendra Kumar Gupta vs State Of U.P. Through The ...
Judges: V Khare, M Katju
11 April, 1994·"243 ZF. Continuance of existing laws and Municipalities:-- Notwithstanding anything in this part, any provision of any law relating to Municipalities in force in a State immediately before the commencement of the Constitution (Seventy fourth Amendment) Act, 1992, which is inconsistent with the prov...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Electricity Board And ... vs Bhawani Prasad And Ors.
Judges: V Bahuguna
11 April, 1994·1. The petitioner challenges the validity and legality of the award of the Labour Court dated January 20, 1992 by means of which a reference made by the State Government under Section 4-K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act has been decided in favour of the workman, respondent No. 1. The Labour Cour...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Godhan Son Of Pola And Others vs Ram Bilas Son Of Mahesh
Judges: H Tilhari
11 April, 1994·6. Dealing with issue No. 4, the trial Court held that defendants-appellants 2 to 4 have failed to prove that they are bona fide purchasers for value without notice of the agreement and that it held that defendants-appellants 2 to 4 have not been bona fide purchasers of the property in dispute witho...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prabhu Narain Rai And Anr. vs Secretary-Cum-General Manager, ...
Judges: S Sodhi, R Sharma
11 April, 1994·2. Prabhu Narain Rai and Suresh Tewari were appointed as clerks on ad hoc basis for a period of 89 days. The first of such appointment was made in September, 1983, On the expiry of this period, after a short break, another such fresh appointment was made and this continued till the year 1985, when t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Motor Industries Company Ltd. vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: S Raza, B Singh
11 April, 1994·5. In the case of Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras v. Mir Mohammad Ali [1964] 53 ITR 165 a three Judge Bench of the honourable Supreme Court held as under : "What then is the test for determining whether a mechanical contrivance is machinery for the purposes of second paragraph of Clause (vi) and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.