State Of U.P. vs Anoop Kumar Misra
Judges: N Ganguly
31 August, 1993·5. Heard the learned Counsel for the State and the opposite party. I am not inclined to grant any further time for filing any further counter-affidavit. However, during the course of arguments, the learned Counsel for the opposite party pointed out paragraphs from the counter-affidavit filed by Sri ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ...
Judges: S Misra
30 August, 1993·(3) That the benefit of repeal law was not available to the claimants solely because the cause of action for the claim arose before the repeal. (4) In any case sufficient cause has not been shown for condonation of delay as the Claim Tribunal without discussing this aspect of the matter has condoned...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport ... vs Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal ...
Judges: S Misra
30 August, 1993·(3) That the benefit of repeal law was not available to the claimants solely because the cause of action for the claim arose before the repeal. (4) In any case sufficient cause has not been shown for condonation of delay as the Claims Tribunal without discussing this aspect of the matter has condone...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Saru Smelting Pvt. Ltd. vs Authority Under Payment Of Wages ...
Judges: B Dikshit
25 August, 1993·4. The argument advanced on behalf of petitioner has much more. The petitioner has specifically stated in paragraph 9 of writ petition that there is no notification by the State Government in Official Gazette under Section 15(1) of the Act appearing Regional Conciliation Officer Meerut as the author...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Natho Mal vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: K Narayan, K Singh
23 August, 1993·15. In the case of Dr. Raghubir Saran v. State of Bihar, , the Supreme Court after referring to a number of decisions of various courts and High Court concluded : 'High Court as the highest court exercising criminal jurisdiction in a state has inherent power to make any order for the purpose of secu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indexport Ltd. And Anr. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: V Khanna, G Mathur
20 August, 1993·3. Clauses 2 (g),(h) and 4 of the U.P. Oil-Seeds and Oil-Seed products Control Order, 1966 which are relevant for the present case read as follows. 2(g) "Dealer" menas a person engaged in the business of purchase or sale or storage for sale of oil seeds or oil sedd products, but does not include the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Sugar Corpn. And Anr. vs Bipin Kumar Mishra
Judges: S Mathur, R Sharma
19 August, 1993·ii. The respondent is a workman within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and his conditions of service are governed by the Standing Order, 1988 issued by the State Government vide Notification dated September 27, 1988 under Section 3(b) of the U.P. Industrial Disp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwati Prasad (In Jail) And Etc. ... vs The State
Judges: O P Pradhan, A Tripathi
19 August, 1993·On internal examination, the doctor found multiple lacerations and tears on the per-etoneum under the injuries. Heart was half full. Abdominal cavity contained about 2 be (sic) clotted blood, stomach was found full of gases with browinsh liquid about 5 oz. Small intestine was full of gases and parti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Kunj Behari And Another vs Sri Krishna Dutt And Another
Judges: A Banerji
18 August, 1993·the High Court or the District Court, as the case may be, may make such order in the case as it thinks fit; Provided that in respect of cases arising out of original suits or other proceedings of any valuation, decided by the District Court, the High Court alone shall be competent to make an order u...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Chand Sri Gopal vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: V Khare, V Bahuguna
18 August, 1993·1. The petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacture of Pan Chatni. It is alleged that the petitioner has been classifying its product named Pan Chatni under Sub-heading 2103.11 of the Tariff Act and has been availing the exemption granted vide notification dated 203.1990. Subsequently the As...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.