Jain Motors Driving Training ... vs The Deputy Transport ...
Judges: M Mukherjee, R Sharma
23 July, 1992·3. In assailing the above office order, Mr. Naithani, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, has first submitted that in view of the clear provisions of Section 9(1) of the Act, there is no legal embargo on grant of a driving licence to a resident of one District by the appropriate author...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pyare Lal Tandon vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: B Yadav, A Singh
22 July, 1992·3. Sri S. M. Dayal, learned counsel for the petitioner urged that no opportunity of hearing was given before disposing of the application under Section 20 by the impugned order, nor reasons have been recorded as required by the proviso to Section 20 of the Act. 4. Learned Standing Counsel, however, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Miss M.S. Annaporani vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: P Basu, G Tripathi
21 July, 1992·It was defiance far beyond Yadav's sufferance. And he had almost the whole village with him, shocked as they were by Santaraji's marriage across the religious line. Using his considerable influence, he had her husband AH Raza arrested on trumped-up charges. With him behind bars, Santaraji was gang-r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Cupro Industrial Corporation
Judges: A Singh, R Gulati
21 July, 1992·2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was in possession of sufficient evidence to prove the genuineness of silver from the three persons ? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct to delete the addition of R...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Triloki Nath Dubey vs Regional Manager, U.P. State Road ...
Judges: R Mehrotra
16 July, 1992·1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has claimed that the petitioner is admittedly senior to one Sri Shyam Behari, a conductor in U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Varanasi Region, Varanasi and is entitled to get the same treatment which Sri Shyam Behari got in the matter of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sakal Deep vs U.P. State
Judges: B Yadav, I Mathur
14 July, 1992·8. Incised deep wound, 6 cm x 2 cm x incised and bone cut of posterior anterior aspect of left fore-arm, 3 1/2 cm below the elbow joint. 9. Incised deep wound, 4 cm x 1 cm x muscle deep, 3 cm from injury No. 3. The cause of death was shown by the doctor was shock and haemorrhage as a result of ante-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P. vs Raj Bahadur S/O Raghunandan And ...
Judges: P Basu, G Tripathi
14 July, 1992·1. Five gun shot injuries of entry each measuring 1 cm x 0.75 cm x cavity deep (abd) on the right side back lumber region over an area of 10 cm x 12 cm. The margin of all wounds are lacerated contused and inverted. All are surrounded by the posterior abd. by abraded collar direction inwards and to t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Devendra Brothers And Co.
Judges: R Gulati, A Singh
13 July, 1992·"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was in law justified in holding that the liability of interest payable to the Allahabad Bank, amounting to Rs. 73,414, was allowable?" 2. We have heard learned standing counsel for the Revenue. None has appeared for the assess...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
K.L. Virmani vs Iiird Additional Dist. Judge, And ...
Judges: N Ganguly
13 July, 1992·The injunction order was communicated by registered post on 26-11-1982 and personally served to respondent No. 3 on 3-12-1982. The defendant No. 2 Sri S. A. Khan was also served with a copy of the interim injunction. 2. It is said that the defendant-respondent No. 3 of the writ petition had visited ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Advance Paper Products vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: A Gupta
13 July, 1992·2. The matter relates to the assessment years 1980-81 (1st part), 1980-81 (2nd part) and 1981-82. The assessing authority had taxed it at 5 per cent up to 6th September, 1981, under Notification No. 332, dated 15th November, 1971 and for the latter period it had taxed at 6 per cent under the Notific...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.