Mohd. Adil Siddiqui vs Jai Devi And Ors.
Judges: K Narain
31 July, 1992·3. Upon service of notice of the appeal, cross-objections were brought by Jai Devi and others, legal representatives of the deceased and they prayed that the Tribunal was not justified in limiting the claim to Rs. 28,000/- and in fact should have been decreed for the whole amount, i.e., Rs. 1,01,000...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nawab Khan vs Vishwanath Shastri
Judges: O Prakash
31 July, 1992·4. The question as formulated above being virgin in the field of election law appears to be somewhat difficult but interesting. 5. Article 329(b) of the Constitution starting with a non obstante clause directs that notwithstanding anything in this Consitution no election to either House of Parliamen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Saraya Sugar Mills (P) Ltd.
Judges: O Prakash, R Gulati
30 July, 1992·" 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal, was legally correct in allowing the assessee's claim of interest of Rs. 1,90,435 paid on account of late payment of cane purchase tax? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justif...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax vs Chhotelal
Judges: O Prakash, R Gulati
30 July, 1992·1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Allahabad Bench) has referred the following question for the opinion of this court under Section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Aet, 1957 : " Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case that may be found by the High Court on a reappraisal of the evidence, the T...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baij Nath And Etc. (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: D Trivedi, R Agarwal
30 July, 1992·On internal examination left parietal and temporal bones were found fractured. According to the doctor injury No. 1 could be caused by a blow of Musal and injury No. 2 was possible by lathi. According to the doctor the cause of death was shock and haemorrhage due to injury No. 1 which by itself was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Winder vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: D Sinha, A Gupta
29 July, 1992·4. Shri Bharat Ji Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that Dharmada charges collected by the petitioner cannot be included in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the petitioner. To buttress his submission Shri Agarwal has relied upon following : (A) (1979) 116 I.T.R. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Mahroz Iqbal And Others vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: S Mathur, B Saksena
27 July, 1992·(k) Requiring that every registered dog shall wear a collar to which shall be attached a token, to be issued by the Panchayat; and (1) providing that a dog, unless registered and wearing such a token, may, if found in any public place, be destroyed or otherwise disposed of." There are modifications ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabir Prasad Dwivedi vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others
Judges: M Katju
27 July, 1992·6. In Paragraphs 19 and 21 of the writ petition it is alleged that the State Government did not give the petitioner opportunity of hearing before passing the confirmation order. The reply to these averments are in Paragraphs 18 and 20 of the counter affidavit of the State Government. Paragraph 18 de...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kishori Lal vs Mahadeo And Ors.
Judges: J Semwal
24 July, 1992·9. The appeal is being decided on merits. The appellant has challenged the order of acquittal on the ground that the Trial Court has not looked into the merits of evidence and that the prosecution has proved his case beyond any shadow of doubt. 10. It is a matter of regret that the lower Court has n...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajib Singh And Others Etc. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another
Judges: S Agarwala, M Katju
23 July, 1992·tion, the only allegation made in the petition is in paragraphs 8 arid 9. In paragraph 8, it has been stated that no publicity was given nor any notice was issued under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act in regard to the notifications. In paragraph 9, however, it has been stated that the Col...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.