Mathura Refinery Mazdoor Sangh ... vs Dy. Chief Labour Commissioner
Judges: D Chauhan
31 January, 1992·2. For certification of the Standing Orders pertaining to the employees of M/s. Mathura Refinery under the provisions of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (for brevity hereinafter referred to as "Standing Orders"). Steps were taken by the Indian On Corporation before Certifying Offic...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Mahesh Chand
Judges: A Singh, R Gulati
31 January, 1992·2. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1979-80. Against the loss return of Rs. 9,145, the assessment was completed on a net taxable income of Rs. 81,042. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax who allowed the appeal and deleted the entire addition made by ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajroo (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: P Gupta
31 January, 1992·5. On an assessment of the entire evidence led by the prosecution the learned Judge found the present appellant guilty of the charge under Section 395, I.P.C. and convicted and sentenced him as above. The other accused Ramgulli alias Ram Charan was, however, not found guilty and was acquitted of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cawnpore Chemical Works Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner Of ...
Judges: A Verma, M Katju
29 January, 1992·5. Sri Bhupeshwar Dayal, learned counsel for the respondent, could not, and in our opinion rightly so, dispute the claim of the petitioner for payment of interest under Sections 214 and 244(1A) accruing as a direct consequence of the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal whereunder the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Malhotra vs Smt. Nirla And Others
Judges: B Yadav
29 January, 1992·3. Sri R. K. Porwal, learned counsel for the applicant urged that the provisions of Order 9 Rules 7 & 8 of the Code would apply, the applicant personally was not at fault, rather his advocate did not appear nor informed the applicant and the applicant could not know about the date fixed or the progr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kumson Motor Owners Union Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: A Verma, M Katju
29 January, 1992·" Gratuity.--No provision exists for the payment of gratuity to the employees of the company under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The accrued liability according to actuarial valuation amounted to Rs. 2,72,436 as on March 31, 1977, for which no provision has been made in the accounts. During the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Ahad vs Smt. Nasreen Bano
Judges: B Kumar, S Dikshit
28 January, 1992·4. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the offer of the appellant given to the respondent to live with him has not been properly considered by the trial court. According to him, the offer is contained in the written statement as well as in the statement recorded by the court during ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Man Mohan Sharma vs U.P. State Textile Corpn. Ltd. And ...
Judges: N Ganguli
28 January, 1992·3. The court was proceeding to dismiss the writ petition on the ground of alternative remedy but the learned counsel for the petitioner requested that he shall submit written argument and place certain case laws to overcome the legal hurdle posed before him by the recent Full Bench judgment in Chand...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Nath Rai vs Managing Director, U.P. Co-Op. ...
Judges: M Bhat
27 January, 1992·3. The petitioner's case is that he was not being paid salary since 19.9.88. However, his juniors who were appointed subsequently to the petitioner's appointment are getting salary. He is said to have moved a representation also on 30.11.88 which was recommended by Assistant Registrar, Cooperative S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indodan Industries Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise And ...
Judges: S Agarwala, S Srivastava
24 January, 1992·1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Union of India. 2. An order dated 30.5.1990 was passed against the petitioner by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Muzaffarnagar demanding a sum of Rs. 3,80,519.04. Against this demand ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.